Prominent Research Scientists Suggest Plausibility of Lab-Created SARS-CoV-2

A well-known group of research scientists from France, Austria, and Australia strongly suggest the time is now to launch an objective, unbiased and apolitical probe into the origins of SARS-CoV-2. While other scientists send research letters to prominent medical journals strongly arguing for a natural origin, the strongest evidence now suggests no clear argument for a nature-based origin while a research-based human-engineered hypothesis becomes ever more plausible. The importance of getting to the truth cannot be underestimated. Given the magnitude, scope, and severity of COVID-19, the scientific and research community have a moral, ethical, and professional responsibility to investigate SARS-CoV-2 origins, unencumbered by political meddling. Too much is at stake, at least for those of us fortunate enough to live in democratic market-based societies.

While much of the scientific world conveniently agreed with a push early on, supported by Dr. Anthony Fauci and certain colleagues at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and academia—that the pathogen originated directly from a bat while making its’ way to humans via some other animal at the Wuhan wet market, the authors herei...

Note:  If you need assistance with your subscription or would like to discuss a corporate subscription for more than 10 employees please contact us or use the chat (bottom right).

$5 / Month
Individuals at home that are reading our content for personal health care or other non-professional reasons.
Like a Starbucks a month
Personal - Single Payment
$50 for 1 Year
Individuals - reading for personal reasons who prefer to pay for one year in advance with no recurring billing.
18% discount to monthly
$12 / Month
Professionals from the healthcare industry who are subscribing on behalf of their company for work reasons.
Way better than coffee