Applying Set Theory & Evidence-Based Medicine Shatters Paper Suggesting COVID-19 Vaccines Saved 14m Lives

757

7 comments

- at - | -

Jul. 2, 2023, 8:00 p.m.

Opinion Article

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of TrialSite Inc., its staff, or its affiliates. The information provided is based on the author's understanding and knowledge at the time of writing and is subject to change as new information becomes available. Readers are encouraged to seek diverse perspectives and perform their own research before forming their own opinion.

Evaluation of effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccination: Set Theory, rigorous statistical methods and actual evidence-based medicine demonstrates that the paper published in The Lancet claiming that COVID-19 vaccines saved 14 million lives is incorrect, based on completely flawed methods and data.

From the perspective of set theory, the world population can be understood as a set of A with N elements. With COVID-19 vaccination, set A was divided into two subsets: subset vaccinated and subset unvaccinated. When evaluating the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination the entire set A has to be put under the evaluation. If one evaluates only the subset vaccinated, this is a fatal mistake that generates erroneous results.

Quality journalism costs money to produce.

Free access provides up to 10 articles

Subscription options start at $5 per month
which is less than a Starbucks coffee!

Peter Gabriel, MD

"Publishing on TrialSite helped me secure a $20m research grant for my work."

Jona Savinda

"TrialSiteNews is my daily read for what is happening in the industry."