Ivermectin Could Turn COVID-19 Around. We Need To Find Out If It Works.

Ivermectin Could Turn COVID-19 Around. We Need To Find Out If It Works.

By Mary Beth Pfeiffer

The COVID-19 patient was in critical condition and declining quickly. “Speak to your mom now,” the pulmonologist recalled telling her son, “because after this you may not be able to.” The son pleaded: Was there something else the doctor could do? Anything? That’s when Dr. Jean-Jacques Rajter shared a bit of medical homework he and his wife and partner, Dr. Juliana Cepelowicz Rajter, had done.

There was a well-known drug, but not approved for COVID, he told the son. In Australia, the drug had obliterated the virus in a laboratory culture test. It had cured millions worldwide of parasitic disease; in her native Brazil, Juliana Rajter recalled pediatricians giving it annually to entire families. It was safe. Rajter obtained informed consent – necessary when a patient is given essentially experimental treatment — and he gave the woman ivermectin. “After 12 hours, she stopped deteriorating,” Jean-Jacques Rajter said. “In 24 hours, she improved. In 48 hours, she didn’t need such a high level of oxygen.” The woman went home in a week.

The Rajters’ ivermectin success was replicated scores of times at four Florida hospitals in the next two months last spring. Their results: A 40 percent lower mortality rate in 173 COVID patients who received ivermectin and standard medications compared to 107 who got usual therapies only. The Rajters aren’t alone. Virtually every week, new reports are emerging of ivermectin’s success against COVID-19. A website tracker lists about 50 papers that are positing ivermectin as the next big thing.

On the WHO’s List of Essential Medicines, ivermectin earned its inventors the Nobel Prize in 2015 for its “immeasurable” role in quelling parasitic diseases like river blindness and lymphatic filariasis. In Africa, where “mass administration” of ivermectin is common to fight these devastating ailments, the drug is possibly having an unintended benefit: It “may be contributing to keeping COVID-19 cases in check and below projections, ” wrote parasitologist Claire Njeri Wamae, who has fought debilitating worms in Nigeria for 40 years.

In other corners of the world: 

  • In the Australian experiment, first reported in April, ivermectin prompted a 5,000-fold reduction in COVID-19 viruses in a petri dish, essentially killing all particles.  
  • One Bangladesh study found that 100 ivermectin-treated patients “tested negative and their symptoms improved within 72 hours.” Another retrospective review of 248 patients there, found that 115 who received ivermectin were far less likely to need oxygen or intensive care, or to die from COVID-19. 
  • In the Dominican Republic, a large medical system treated 1,300 COVID patients with ivermectin and azithromycin, and declared 99 percent cured. 
  • In Egypt, ivermectin played a “highly significant role” in protecting 203 family members of COVID patients; just 7 percent of treated people became infected with the virus compared to nearly 60 percent who were not treated.

Such findings have led Thomas Borody, an Australian doctor famous for a cure for stomach ulcers, to propose a COVID therapy of ivermectin, doxycycline and zinc. “It’s an easy virus to kill,” he told a TV interviewer. 

Efficacy Must Be Proven   

Most certainly, reports of ivermectin’s promise are preliminary, based mostly on studies that are not randomized controlled trials or peer-reviewed; some are anecdotal. So, please, take this with a grain of salt. But, given the global enthusiasm for ivermectin, along with its safety profile and known antiviral qualities, shouldn’t we try to find out if the potential is real? An early treatment and preventative could vastly defuse the coronavirus threat and let normal life resume. But that will happen only if we do the work. So far, we haven’t. 

Of 54 ivermectin trials on clinicaltrials.gov, just three are based in the United States, none of them federally funded. Outpacing the U.S. are Egypt, with 10 trials; India, eight; Spain, five; and Argentina, four. Like the U.S., Brazil, Bangladesh and Mexico list three studies each. A generic pill used against parasites apparently holds little interest for investors, pharmaceutical companies or government funders. They cling instead to the almost mythical belief that vaccines are the answer to fighting viruses, despite a wealth of evidence that existing antimicrobials and antiparasitics can also kill them. Hence, the United States has committed $11.2 billion to COVID vaccine research, to the detriment of studies on existing drugs that might actually cure the infection. Ivermectin costs $10 to $20 per treatment — which may be a problem in a profit-driven health-care system. 

Nothing To Offer The Infected   

With no approved early treatment, symptomatic patients are told to hydrate, take palliatives and quarantine. That works mostly for young, healthy bodies that spend lots of time in the sun. But a week into the infection, too many other patients show up in Dr. Charles Thompson’s emergency room in Columbia, S.C. These include patients with low Vitamin D levels – even young ones — or pre-existing conditions like diabetes, hypertension or cardiovascular disease. “They are clutching at their chest, gasping for breath and begging you to save them,” Thompson, a pulmonologist, told me. “I’m sick of watching people die this way. It’s a travesty.” 

Why? Because it’s unnecessary. Since late February, Thompson has treated perhaps a thousand outpatients with hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, zinc and supplements, to which, in May, he added ivermectin. Just one of his patients has been hospitalized — for COVID-related diarrhea. A voracious reader of the medical literature, Thompson is in awe of the “elegant” way that ivermectin functions, working, he and others have learned, both in early and later COVID stages.

While the virus is multiplying in early infection, ivermectin is believed to inhibit a key receptor that opens the door for viral proteins to enter the nucleus of cells and replicate. Later on, the drug may inhibit the virus from adhering to CD147 receptors on red blood cells and forming clumps, the process that can lead to dangerous clots and stroke. Thompson is among a dozen practitioners I have spoken with who believe that hydroxychloroquine has been maligned and miscast – it is effective and safe, they hold. Many see ivermectin as an unheralded up-and-comer. Yandy Palenzuela-Rodriguez, 31, is a physician assistant in internal medicine who worked with Dr. Rajter at Broward Health Medical Center in Fort Lauderdale, Fl., when COVID emerged. 

“Early on, we saw less of his patients went to ICU and RCU” — intensive and respiratory care units, he said. “More of his patients went home quicker.” As with too many front-line health workers, Palenzuela-Rodriguez, 31, got COVID in July. That’s when his pulse oxygen level plummeted, and he interrupted Rajter’s dinner with a call for help. He took ivermectin and experienced what his own patients had. “The big kick I felt in terms of improvement was after the ivermectin,” he said.  

Works In Late Disease   

Significantly, Rajter and Palenzuela-Rodriguez were seeing ivermectin work in hospitalized patients already ravaged by the virus. Imagine the suffering and money that could be saved if such a drug was used early, as it was for a woman in Chicago who awoke on day 4 of COVID symptoms feeling “like there was an elephant on my chest.” The inhaler and anticoagulant from an ER visit weren’t helping, she told me, and she struggled to breathe. She started ivermectin.

“Literally eight hours later, by that night, I was breathing normal. I’m not exaggerating,” said the woman, who works in pharmaceuticals and asked that her name not be used. “It was a life-saving treatment for me.” “You can avoid the entire cascade of inflammatory changes,” Rajter told me. “They don’t even get admitted to the hospital.” Some, but not enough, U.S. doctors are quietly using ivermectin for COVID, often combining it with hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and zinc. “When someone’s sick, there’s more likely a synergy between these agents,” said Dr. Steven Phillips of Wilton, Ct. Some patients got better on antibiotics alone, Phillips said, while others told him ivermectin wasa “game changer.”   

“Obviously, more studies need to be done,” said Dr. Richard Horowitz of Hyde Park, N.Y., who has treated about 30 COVID patients. “But patients are responding well to the drug in my practice, and it has been safe and well tolerated.” Pre-COVID, Lyme disease specialists like Phillips and Horowitz knew both ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for their roles in treating the effects of tick-borne illness. But few doctors in the U.S. have such experience or willingness to treat. Which is why a report on NPR’s WHYY on the excitement about ivermectin was headlined: “So why hasn’t anyone heard of it?” 

Ivermectin’s Downside: It’s Cheap  

“Its major ‘disadvantage’ is its low cost and general availability,” Dr. Jose Natalio Redondo, a hospital executive in the Dominican Republic, told me. “There is no major revenue for those large pharmaceutical industries to invest in new research and production of this drug.” Poorer countries, without the resources or self-importance of the U.S., are trying the drug, with success reported, for example, in Iraq, where a small study found “significantly lower” length of hospital stay in ivermectin patients. In Brazil, some municipalities have distributed “COVID kits” with hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, and the minister of health has authorized its use. Patients are also taking the drug in PeruBolivia and India, where the state of Uttar Pradash has sanctioned use for treatment and prevention.

Its profit picture aside, ivermectin’s similarities to hydroxychloroquine, as safe old drugs with antiviral potential, are also working against it. After President Trump endorsed HCQ for COVID, the drug was caught up in a political, media-fueled firestorm that hammered away at findings of failure and ignored promising reports. Although many studies were riddled with flaws – using the drug too late, as in a Veterans Affairs study, and drawing on unverifiable data that forced a Lancet retraction – its image of failure lingers. 

This may explain why the Rajters’ observational study, written with four colleagues, was rejected by two journals. A third journal put it through three peer reviews, all of them positive, but then sought a fourth reviewer, who asked for changes. It has been resubmitted. Dr. Peter Hibberd, an emergency room physician in Florida, said: “The bottom line is patients were getting phenomenal results yet no one would accept his publication.” 

‘Wonder Drug’ or Dud?     

Not all of the early studies of ivermectin for COVID are positive, among them a small study from Bangladesh; patients who got a single ivermectin dose on top of “usual care” recovered quicker than controls, though not in in terms of statistical significance. Nor is there universal agreement on ivermectin’s potential for treating COVID.  Andy Crump, a visiting professor at two Tokyo universities, has worked and published with ivermectin’s discoverer, Satoshi Omura, for 15 years. He is pessimistic about ivermectin for COVID, despite his 2017 scientific review that called it a “wonder drug” with “extraordinary” antibacterial, antiviral and anti-cancer potential.

In an email from Japan, Crump wrote, “Personally, I do not expect ivermectin will be of any use in combatting SARS-CoV-2 or Covid-19, based on past experiences and my knowledge of the current situation.” He gave several reasons, including the need for “huge concentrations” of the drug to fight the virus – though treating doctors dispute this — along with the reality that “ivermectin has been shown to be active against a variety of viruses in vitro but has not been developed to combat any of them,” including Zika, dengue, and yellow fever. 

Further, he pointed to the lack of interest in the drug for COVID by either Merck, the pharmaceutical giant whose scientist, William Campbell, shared in the Nobel Prize, or China, which he said is the world leader in “the development, production, delivery and use of ivermectin.” He wrote at another point, “Approving its use in Latin America and testing it on people with COVID-19 is not scientifically sensible or ethically acceptable.” Omura has nonetheless helped secure funding for a clinical trial of ivermectin at Kitasato University Hospital in Tokyo, Crump said. 

FDA Urges Caution

On its website, the FDA states: “While there are approved uses for ivermectin in people and animals, it is not approved for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19.” The agency warned against taking ivermectin formulations meant for animals – it is used to prevent heartworm in dogs, for example — noting more studies are needed to determine whether it works for COVID-19 in people. The question is: Will we get them? In the meantime, doctors still may use ivermectin off-label, a common practice in which drugs are prescribed for other-than approved ailments. 

A 28-year-old OB-GYN resident named Adeline Marie Fagan died on Sept. 9, seven months after contracting COVID-19. She is one of many healthcare workers who have succumbed to an infection for which medicine purports to have no cure. Maybe. Maybe not. Dr. Fagan’s death in Houston may have been made more likely, as many others are, by a previous illness. She had a neurological condition as a child that left her in a wheelchair though she later played varsity lacrosse and made four humanitarian trips during medical school to Haiti. Who can say if this woman with a future filled with promise and hope would have survived if treated early and effectively?

But the Rajters and Thompson, who together have treated some two thousand patients, told me that many had serious, compromising illnesses such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes. For patients with severe pulmonary disease in the Rajters’ study, the mortality rate in the group that got ivermectin was half that of the group that did not— 39 percent versus 81 percent. The U.S. government’s research agenda for COVID-19 has four priority areas: virus research; diagnostics; treatments, and vaccines. Under treatments, it calls in part for “identifying and evaluating drugs already approved for other conditions that could be repurposed to treat COVID-19.” Ivermectin is one such drug.  

Mary Beth Pfeiffer is an investigative journalist, science writer and author of “Lyme: The First Epidemic of Climate Change.”


  1. FAQ on Ivermectin and SARS-CoV-2
    Frequently Asked Questions on Ivermectin

    answered by Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Paul Marik (FLCCC Alliance)
    (last updated March 10, 2021)

    There have been many questions about ivermectin, and rightly so. Below we provide detailed and comprehensive answers to the most common questions we have received. First and foremost, many simply ask, “Can ivermectin really do all you’ve said it can do—prevent and treat all phases of COVID-19 disease? It seems too good to be true – again.”

    The answer to this question relies on the fact that ivermectin, since its development 40 years ago, has already demonstrated its ability to make historic impacts on global health, given it led to the eradication of a “pandemic” of parasitic diseases across multiple continents. These impacts are what awarded the discoverers of ivermectin the 2015 Nobel prize in Medicine.

    More recently, profound anti-viral and anti-inflammatory properties of ivermectin have been identified. In COVID-19 specifically, studies show that one of its several anti-viral properties is that it strongly binds to the spike protein, keeping the virus from entering the cell. These effects, along with its multiple abilities to control inflammation, both explain the markedly positive trial results already reported, and poise ivermectin to again achieve similar historic impacts via the eradication of COVID-19.

    Please read also our One-page summary of our Review of the Emerging Evidence Supporting the Use of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19. Also check out our Videos & Tutorials and our Help Pages for Patients & Relatives.
    How could ivermectin be effective if the tissue concentrations needed to kill the virus would require a patient to take massive doses to achieve?
    My Primary care physician (PCP) will not prescribe ivermectin. Where can I get a script?
    Can I request expert advice or consultation from the FLCCC Alliance?
    Will ivermectin interfere with the vaccine and can I continue to take ivermectin once vaccinated?
    Is ivermectin safe and are there any contraindications for use?
    Can ivermectin be given to patients with acute or chronic liver disease?
    Shouldn’t we do a large, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to “prove” it works before adopting yet another treatment that will not work?
    Aren’t most of the trials poorly designed and executed, with high risks of bias?
    Given the large and rapidly rising numbers of U.S patients with COVID-19, couldn’t a large randomized controlled trial be performed quickly?
    Shouldn’t we wait for more data before widely adopting another medicine that may not work?
    If ivermectin is so effective in COVID-19, how come no countries have adopted it into their national treatment guidelines?
    Isn’t the existing set of clinical studies of ivermectin inconclusive since they are all small?
    Isn’t the promotion of ivermectin the same thing as hydroxychloroquine – everyone claims it works when all the randomized controlled trials showed it didn’t?
    How does the NIH arrive at their recommendations for current widely used therapies and why is the rationale for these recommendations so difficult to understand?
    Doesn’t most of the data on ivermectin come primarily from uncontrolled observational trials?
    Aren’t the majority of the existing studies not yet peer-reviewed?
    Shouldn’t we wait until there are more randomized controlled trials?
    Isn’t it a problem that all the trials were done in foreign countries and may not be generalizable to our patients here?
    The NIH claims that there is ‘insufficient evidence’ to recommend for or against the use of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19
    Why should we be convinced of findings from non-peer reviewed epidemiologic analyses that do not employ control groups?
    Are veterinary ivermectin products considered to be pharmacologically equivalent to human formulations and are these products safe for use?
    Is it possible to get an off-label prescription for ivermectin?
    Can a pharmacist refuse to fill a valid prescription for ivermectin written by a licensed health care provider?

    Download our “Frequently Asked Questions on Ivermectin” as PDF

  2. If you cannot get the tablets(impossible in Canada as no doctor will prescribe no matter how much info you give them) you can get 1.8% Ivermectin paste. The weight control on the application syringe is based on 200ug/kg body weight, and gives you the proper doseage of Ivermectin in the paste for your weight. Ivermectin is the only active ingredient, the other ingredients are FDA approved food additives for foods such as ice cream and gels. I have mine ready in case I or any family members contract Covid. Good luck everyone. I was planning to use the Peru protocol.

  3. Thanks for trial and informative article. Now need research on properly select the effective dose.

  4. That is a good description of the need to be prepared with IVERMECTIN, DOXYCYCLIN , ZINC, HCQ.
    But please what is the dosage ?

    1] For treatment as soon as symptoms appear, one dose or repeated , how often…

    2]Prophylaxis regime ?

    HELP !
    Thanks Dr Denis

    1. Dr. Denis, my friend’s Mexican doctor gave her Ivermectin 12 mg each day for two days. Doxycycline 100 mg one bid for 10 days, and Zinc 50-75 mg a day for 10 days. He also recommended a daily aspirin to hopefully, prevent blood clots. Make sure your patients have robust serum 25 OH vitamin D levels, (in the 60-80 ng/ml range). And make sure they are taking their appropriate dose daily. Also, vitamin C is key as well. Most docs who use vitamin C, recommend 2000-4000 mg a day. Look up Dr. Paul Marik’s MATH+ protocol. He is Chief of Critical Care Medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School. He is a true hero. Also, listen to the podcast here on TrialSite News that they did with Drs Jean Jacque and Juliana Ratjer, the two pulmonologists, husband and wife, using Ivermectin in their Covid hospitalized patients in Broward County, in Florida. They use the usual dose of 200 micrograms per kilogram, the usual anti parasitic dose. That works out to around 12 mg ivermectin for a 140 pound person. Some docs go higher, of course. The safe dosing range is wide, fortunately. Cheers.
      ML, FNP

  5. This is such a no-brainer!!!
    What’s the downside,
    Ivermectin, Zinc Sulphate and Doxycycline in the dosages recommended by Prof Brody, Dr Rajter or Dr Thompson won’t kill you at the most it might give you the runs but Sars Covid 19 could.
    why not take as a prophylactic if feeling ill and as a cure if we get it.
    We could open up our economies and save all the lives that are being lost now & in the future due to depression, suicide et al.
    Oh and by the way what about homeopathic cures for Covid? I am reminded of malaria which I have had several times for which the “Regular Medical Profession” says their is no cure nor any vaccine but which homeopathic medicines have cured me every time. Yes, true I’ve been reinfected when I’ve had to work in areas where malaria is endemic, but that’s the nature of a disease for which there is no vaccine.

  6. This is just another example of the FDA being unduly influenced by big pharma and hospitals. Follow the money. Treatments make money and cures don’t. Stem Cell treatments have been shown to be safe and effective in dozens of phase 1&2 Clinical Trials but I see only 1 small phase 3 for arthritis that affects over 25% of Americans. “Something is rotten in Denmark.”

  7. This is another great Ivermectin article by TrialSiteNews. In my opinion, the author, Mary Beth Pfeiffer, wrote a well organized and technically accurate article. She is to be commended for paying attention to and writing about the facts.

    It is not surprising that the FDA has warned against using Hydroxychlorquine (HCQ) and Ivermectin to treat Covid-19 victims, because neither of these promising antiviral drugs has been through a Random Controlled Trial (RCT), particularly a RCT the shows a mortality benefit.However, many doctors consider it unethical to design an RCT study where half of the Covid-19 victims received a sugar pill type placebo and the other half receive Hydroxchlorquine or Ivermectin based treatments. By the way, Remdesivir never showed a mortality benefit in a RCT study, yet it was endorsed by the FDA, and the USA government has spent billions of dollars scaling up and distributing Remdesivir. I personally would not take Remdesivir because there is no demonstrated mortality benefit and it requires at least 5 injections presumably in a hospital environment.

    It is well known that USA doctors can legally prescribe off-label Covid-19 prescriptions for either HCQ or Ivermectin treatment protocols listed above, because these two drugs have been approved by the FDA for treating other diseases. In many states, Doctors may not issue a Hydroxychlorquine prescription without a positive Covid-19 test. This is a very bad law; it makes it difficult to get a timely HCQ prescription. I live in a state that prohibits HCQ prescription unless you have a positive Covid-19 test which can take 5 to 7 days. Hence I am more interested in getting an Ivermectin prescription to take with me me when I travel to other cities or in the event I cannot get a timely and cooperative doctor’s appointment where I live.

    I was able to obtain a legal prescription of Ivermectin and Azithromycin because we travel a lot, and I submitted some of my Covid-19 Ivermectin writings in conjunction with some Covid-19 data from a well known Epidemiologist to an online Doctor. That doctor issued the prescription. It is hard to get a legal prescription of Ivermectin, but it is not impossible. If you are traveling to a malaria infested regions of the world, you can get prescription of HCQ to take with you. it seems you cannot get a prescription of HCQ that treats Covid-19 in order to take it with you on travel, at least from any of the doctors I have contacted.

    The Covid-19 travel problem exists if you get Covid-19 in a city far away from your home because you will likely be denied a return flight boarding because of a high fever. And if you have no doctor contacts in that city, you will likely be unable to get an antiviral prescription for Covid-19 whether it is with Ivermectin or Hydroxychlorquine. Hence, you might get extremely sick or even die before you can return home to your doctors and your family. I believe High Risk persons should have some Covid-19 treatment drugs with them or in the event they are unable to get a timely doctor’s prescription of antiviral drugs when they are at home.

    Many new Covid-19 outpatients are told by their Department of Health and many primary care doctors there is no FDA approved treatment for Covid-19 outpatients and they should isolate themselves and take Advil or Tylenol for pain relief. My wife and I are senior citizens and we were told by our primary care doctors, who work for a large Health Care Organization, they are now forbidden from writing any Hydroxychlorquine prescription to treat Covid-19. Our primary doctors know that Ivermectin is a parasite treatment drug, but they seemed to not be familiar with its possible use to treat Covid-19. And if it were not for TrialSite News, very few would know anything about Ivermectin as related to Covid-19 treatments

    My advice if you are a high risk person, meaning a person over age of 60, or you have comorbidities such as diabetes, cardiac problems, COPD, grossly overweight, and/or you are a member of any minority group, is to develop a Plan now. More specifically I believe you need to find a doctor that will agree to promptly treat you with antiviral drugs (Hydroxychlorquine (or doxycycline-) + Azithromycin +Zinc Sulfate — or — Ivermectin+ Doxycycline (or Azithromycin)+ Zinc Sulfate , WITHIN 1 to 5 days of the first onset of your future Covid-19 symptoms. Or something else if it has shown promising results. And what if your selected doctor is ill or out of town when you get Covid-19?

    Why do you need a plan now, before you develop Covid-19, if you are a high risk person? It often takes 3 to 5 days just to get a doctors appointment and the odds are your primary care doctor will not write a prescription for either of the above described treatment protocols. If that happens you are in danger of not being able to start antiviral treatment during the approximately 5 day critical treatment window for starting Covid-19 antiviral drugs. You may then need to get an appointment with an infectious disease doctor, preferably one that has treated Covid-19 outpatients with an antiviral drug protocol. That is likely to take a week or more just to speak to that busy doctor.

    I believe the alleged FDA outpatient advice to isolate yourself and take Advil for pain if you get Covid-19 is unacceptable. I believe there are much better Covid-19 outpatient treatment options than taking Advil or Tylenol and I believe Hi-risk persons need to develop a plan now and find those doctors that will agree to treat you promptly with the best option available.

    1. That is a good description of the need to be prepared with IVERMECTIN, DOXYCYCLIN , ZINC, HCQ.
      But please what is the dosage ?

      1] For treatment as soon as symptoms appear, one dose or repeated , how often…

      2]Prophylaxis regime ?

      HELP !
      Thanks Dr Denis

      1. Dosificacion para Tratamuento Covid19

        Ivermectina comprimido 6mg
        0,4mg x kg de peso
        – 2 comorimidos de 15 a 30kg
        – 4 comprimidos 60kg
        – 6 comprimidos 90kg
        Por 3 días a 4 dias consecutivos despues del almuerzo ocena

        – Dociciclina 100mg cada 12hs por 7 a 10 dias
        – Zinc 50mg por dia por 14 dias.

        Dra Lucy Kerr (Brasil)
        Dt. Thomas Borody (Australia)

      2. Good!
        1) For Treatment Mild and moderate phase
        Ivermectin 6mg tablets It is taken for 3 or 4 consecutive days with lunch or dinner
        0.4mg x kg of weight
        – 2 tablet 6mg 15 to 30kg
        – 4 tablets for 60kg – 6 tablets for 90kg
        – 8 tablets for 120kg

        Doxicyclin 100mg
        – 1 tablet every 12 hours for 7 days. –

        Zinc 50mg, Vitamin D 2000 IU , Vitamin C 2gr per day for 14 days

        2) for Prophylaxis
        Ivermectin 6mg Single dose every 15 days
        0.2mg per kilo of weight
        – 1 tablet up to 30kg
        – 2 tablets up to 60kg
        – 3 tablets up to 90kg
        – 4 tablets up to 120kg

        Zinc 25mg, Vitamin D 1000UI, Vitamin C 1gr per day.

        – Dr Lucy Kerr (Brazil)
        – Dr Thomas Borody (Australia)

  8. It is so refreshing to read a measured, informative article on possible treatments for covid-19.

    When faced with a crisis with no universally accepted solution it seems odd, to me, that so many keep waiting for RCT’s to allow treatments. It’s a very odd way to manage the process.

    It’s so odd that so many have attempted to discredit the work of Professor Raoult using the HCQ cocktail, and the experiences of Dr Zelenko and others, who were actually treating patients. RCT’s are just one aspect of evidence. Relying only on them seems misguided, in my opinion. Ivermectin seems to be generating interesting results and appears to be pretty safe ( with the usual checks on avoiding alcohol, etc…). Unfortunately, in northern hemisphere countries it is not as widely used and hence fewer physicians have a great deal of experience with it. The dosages seem to vary a great deal, while preventive dosages are also unclear. One needs guidance, and that is not easy to get given the tendency to rely of luck for avoiding the virus, and more lucky in hoping it doesn’t lead to an actual disease.

  9. Excellent write up. Need more people to speak up like her. The Big Pharmas should start backing up the use only then it will be a success otherwise we can do hundred studies and scream but no one will listen. The notion that it is used for animals mainly has been the main obstacle. And also it is not an antibiotic and cheap delays the prescription of Ivermectin by doctors. In my opinion and experience if given within the first five days of symptoms it will reduce the mortality drastically. Also using it as a prophylaxis could be beginning for opening up the world.