Is Regulatory Capture Behind the Strange Observations Associated with the Recent COVID—19 Ciclesonide Study?

This Ciclesonide randomized controlled trial stood up to peer-review and was published in the highly regarded JAMA. However, the way they presented the results is very strange—even concerning. Why dilute the results, and lessen headline potential, like the treatment of the highly efficacious, but cheap fluvoxamine trials? Here is their conclusion: "The results of this randomized clinical trial demonstrated that ciclesonide did not achieve the primary efficacy endpoint of a reduced time to alleviation of all COVID-19–related symptoms."

Thanks to a tip from a long-standing, TrialSite community member from Orange County, California we report these findings. That's an unimpressive-sounding result. However, the details from the trial showed that their secondary endpoint was that participants who were treated with ciclesonide had fewer subsequent emergency department visits or hospital admissions for reasons related to COVID-19 (odds ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.85). No participants died during the study. The Phase 3 study was sponsored by Covis Pharma S.à.r.L.

An 82% risk reduction in emergency room visits and/or hospitalization due to COVID-19 is something that could make a massi...

Note:  If you need assistance with your subscription or would like to discuss a corporate subscription for more than 10 employees please contact us or use the chat (bottom right).

Personal
$5 / Month
Individuals at home that are reading our content for personal health care or other non-professional reasons.
Like a Starbucks a month
Personal - Single Payment
$50 for 1 Year
Individuals - reading for personal reasons who prefer to pay for one year in advance with no recurring billing.
18% discount to monthly
Professional
$12 / Month
Professionals from the healthcare industry who are subscribing on behalf of their company for work reasons.
Way better than coffee