- MemberAugust 3, 2021 at 7:37 pm
One view: The Vaccinater Logic – “It’s the Best We Have to End the Pandemic”
The Psychology of Vaccination
This is a special episode of Remarkable People that involves not one but nine remarkable people talking about the COVID-19 vaccine.
They are experts in the fields of such as psychology, history, decision sciences, and human behavior. They agreed to participate in this special project in order to help combat the corona virus.
I asked them to assume that we figured out the development, manufacturing, and logistics of vaccination. Then I posed one question: how do we ensure as many people as possible get vaccinated?
Alternative view: Ivermectin Anti-viralists: “There Are More and Better Ways to Combat Infection and Death From SARS-CoV-2”, and one of them is ivermectin. A report in defense of ivermectin, while not against vaccination.
Does popularity on YouTube make a claim false? The writer then says this:
“Ivermectin is approved in the US in tablet form to treat parasitic worms as well as a topical solution to treat external parasites. The drug is also available for animals.”
Interesting, and true as far as I am aware. The writer could have also mentioned that the discoverers of Ivermectin won a Nobel prize, that it has been in use for 40 years, is on the WHO’s list of essential medicines, and is used safely by 3.7 billion people world-wide . The writer then says this:
“The US Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health have said the drug is not approved for the prevention or treatment of Covid-19. According to the FDA, side effects for the drug include skin rash, nausea and vomiting.”
Firstly, let’s deal with the second sentence. What the FDA actually say is that these are some of the side effects “which may be associated with ivermectin” . Secondly, most medicines have side-effects and the existence of side-effects do not disqualify a medicine from approval. Finally, the risk of death seems to me to be quite a bit worse than skin rash, nausea and vomiting, even if those side effects always occur (which according to the FDA they don’t).
However the first sentence about the FDA is the core of the writer’s effort to discredit Ivermectin, but in fact is simply a statement of the current position of the FDA. Furthermore, what the FDA actually say is that Ivermectin’s “benefits and safety for these purposes have not been established” . The real story here – which the writer seems uninterested in – is that the experts who testified at the senate hearing believe that the benefits and safety of Ivermectin have been established and they want the authorities such as NIH and FDA to urgently review the evidence that exists. Instead, the writer follows her misleading comments about the FDA with the following:
“Dr Amesh Adalja, an infectious disease expert at Johns Hopkins University, said most of the research around ivermectin at the moment is made up of anecdotes and studies that are not the gold standard in terms of how to use ivermectin. “We need to get much more data before we can say this is a definitive treatment,” he said. “We would like to see more data before I recommend it to my patients.””
The question here is this. Why should what Dr Amesh Adalja apparently says be given more credence than the experts who testified at the Senate Hearing? Furthermore, what Dr Adalja says doesn’t actually make the central claim false.
At this point, the writer decides it is time to provide details of studies:
“In June, Australian researchers published the findings of a study that found ivermectin inhibited the replication of Sars-CoV-2 in a laboratory setting, which is not the same as testing the drug on humans or animals.”
In terms of the actual evidence of efficacy and safety, there are numerous more recent and more compelling items of evidence which the writer could have given as examples. To be fair to the author – because of the influence of articles like hers – the evidence in favour of Ivermectin is more difficult to find than it should be, but it isn’t impossible to find if you are prepared to make the effort. Sky News Australia managed to do that when they reported on the findings of world-renowned Professor Thomas Borody back in August .
The remainder of the article is focused on apparent concerns that people would self-medicate and would deplete supplies of the medicine putting those who needed it for non-Covid conditions at risk. These are certainly topics worth consideration, but surely the overriding question here is whether Ivermectin is a treatment that could significantly reduce hospitalisation and save many lives.
What is wrong here?
What is wrong here? That is the sixty-four thousand dollar question – as they saying goes.
For one thing, the writer obviously has an agenda to discredit Ivermectin as a treatment for Covid-19. I think it is clear from reading this article that Dupuy’s mind was made up before she wrote the first word. The question is why. I think the immediate cause is that Dupuy is immersed in a narrative that treatments like Ivermectin are fake news and misinformation, but I think the ultimate causes are many and complex and here I suggest some possibilities.
A secondary question is why the NZ Herald chose to publish this article dismissing Ivermectin, rather than an article about the research that has been done on Ivermectin. Here again I think the answer is that the staff at the NZ Herald are all immersed in the same narrative as Dupuy. Furthermore, somehow we have gotten to the point where there is a high price to be paid by either individuals or organisations for stepping outside of the mainstream narrative – and few are brave enough to do that.
One question we might ask is why more members of the public don’t see through articles like the one I have analysed here. For one thing, the article pulls out all the stops when it comes to devious tricks of persuasion, and I think most people can be forgiven for succumbing to those tactics because most people don’t expect journalists in well respected publications to be trying to mislead them. I’ve no doubt that Dupuy writes well and is intelligent, but unfortunately when such a person chooses to suspend their objectivity and critical thinking skills they may end up using their talents in support of a false narrative. The problem is made much worse because this kind of article is the only kind of article being seen by many people – including the members of the mainstream media themselves. If more objective articles existed, articles like this would not even make it to print.
We are told many people are dying or are at risk of dying, and that hospitals are at extreme risk of being overwhelmed – if these claims are true then authorities should be taking potential treatments seriously. If new vaccines have been developed with such speed, why isn’t the potential re-purposing of existing drugs like Ivermectin being given equal urgency? We should all be very concerned that the mainstream media seem to be discrediting and silencing discussion about potential treatments – treatments that could save countless lives and reduce the economic damage and other harms being done by lockdown measures.
- MemberAugust 7, 2021 at 2:55 am
Great dissection. Many of your points raised I have asked myself.
I notice now that at least two drugs (can’t remember which right now but one of them is for cholesterol) have recently been making headlines for potential against covid. I looked one of them up and it appears to still be within patent. I can’t help wondering if there is financial incentive factoring somewhere.
- MemberAugust 7, 2021 at 8:30 am
Thanks, I only presented other views. I was not the author, except to say “one view” and “alternative view”.
See the following for the complicated collusions of governments, militaries, media corporations and individuals who are self-promoting.
- MemberAugust 7, 2021 at 8:14 pm
Attorney Thomas Renz: “MORE Than 45,000 People Have Died From the Covid-19 Vaccines Within 3 Days of Vaccination”
By captaindaretofly on August 5, 2021 • ( 6 Comments )
Attorney Thomas Renz revealed new shocking information at the Stop The Shot conference that he had received from credible whistleblowers.
Attorney Thomas Renz revealed on Truth For Health’s Stop The Shot live conference that the original figure of 45,000 people who have allegedly died from the Covid-19 vaccines within three days of vaccination is too low.
Renz said that VAERS data from whistleblowers is currently being analysed and appears to show that the original statistic he revealed last month at an event hosted by Awakened America is only a fraction of the real number of deaths.
The attorney said that the true number of deaths is likely “immensely higher” and is being hidden by the government.
According to attorney Renz, the public is not being given access to all of the death and injury data from the 11 to 12 vaccine injury reporting systems.
Renz said: “Any public policy being made without independent study of this data will lead to poor and or dangerous policies being made for we the people.”
Attorney Renz said that once the data has been analysed, he will release the information over the next few weeks.
Previously, Renz stated at the Awaken America event last month that a whistleblower – referred to as Jane Doe – informed him that there are around 11 VAERS systems reporting adverse reactions and deaths across the US, and one system alone has allegedly has reported the shocking 45,000 deaths from the Covid jabs.
Renz and his law firm, along with America’s Frontline Doctors, are currently suing the federal government for covering up the true number of deaths from the Covid-19 vaccines and for approving the jabs for use on children.
High Risk of Children Being Paralysed by the Covid Vaccine
Currently, in the US, the Pfizer Covid vaccine has been approved for children aged 12 years and older and has tragically caused countless injuries and deaths post-injection.
The Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) has recently requested Pfizer and Moderna to expand their clinical trials involving children to include 5-to-11-year-olds, with trials even being carried out on children as young as 6 months old.
Disturbingly, Thomas Renz revealed at the conference yesterday that information from published clinical trials showed that children had a 1 in 1000 chance of paralysis from the Covid-19 vaccines.
“The FDA wouldn’t investigate this. Why? Why wouldn’t they investigate this? Don’t you think that’s important?
“Paralysing our children especially as we push it [the vaccine] on younger and younger children who have zero statistical risk of death from Covid-19?”, Renz questioned at the conference.
Renz continued by stating that the FDA should investigate the cases of paralysis and stop the rollout of the vaccines to children.
Younger People are More Likely to Die From the Vaccine Than Covid
Additional information released by attorney Thomas Renz included the shocking revelation that those aged under 30 are more likely to be killed by the vaccine than Covid.
Renz said: “Based on our statistical analysis if you are under 30 the ‘vaccine’ is more likely to kill you than save you.”
Hospitals are Overwhelmed by the Vaccinated
Various hospital whistleblowers have come forward and revealed to Thomas Renz and his team that hospitals are seeing fully vaccinated breakthrough cases at an “astounding rate.”
Renz said that numerous whistleblowers have stated that they are seeing fully vaccinated individuals in ICUs at a rate anywhere from 40% to 100%.
“People who are fully vaccinated are accounting for 40% or more of admissions for Covid and Covid related illness. 40% or more, that is pretty amazing considering the government’s telling us you won’t ever be admitted and you’ll be safe if you get this vaccine.”
Renz said that one hospital whistleblower revealed that there have been several periods where, in her hospital, 100% of the ICU patients were comprised of breakthrough cases.
The attorney said that these Covid breakthrough cases are “exactly what we are seeing in the UK and Israel” and is proof that the Covid jab “is not safe or effective.”
Dead People are Being Counted in Vaccination Stats
At the Stop The Shot conference, Renz also revealed that he has been contacted by more whistleblowers who have shed a light on the reality of the Covid “pandemic” and the danger of the vaccines.
One whistleblower informed Renze that deceased people are being counted as fully vaccinated in the Covid-19 vaccination stats.
Renz said that the 70% number the government is saying has got vaccinated is “fiction” and has been overinflated and is being used by the media as propaganda to push a false narrative.
“We don’t when exactly that final number is going to come out, but what we do know is that we have confirmed that there are a number of vaccinated people that are actually dead. They were dead when they were vaccinated,” Renz said.
He said during the conference that this is a “common action in healthcare fraud” and the inaccurate statistics are being used to fuel the vaccine agenda.
“The 70% vaccination rate is a lie, or at least incorrect,” the Ohio-based attorney said.
Association of State Medical Boards Are Threatening Doctors
Furthermore, attorney Renz stated that there are plenty of alternative medicines that are completely safe and effective that have been used by doctors across the US to treat Covid-19, but that these doctors have been censored and suppressed.
Renz said that the Association of State Medical Boards is threatening to remove doctors’ licenses if the doctors attempt to tell patients the truth about early treatments or the dangers of the “vaccines.”
Medicines such as Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine are just two treatments named by Renz as being suppressed and “slandered” by the mainstream media and big pharma in favour of the vaccines.
More Whistleblowers are Coming Forward
To conclude, Thomas Renz thanked the countless whistleblowers who have come forward to reveal the truth about the Covid-19 “pandemic” and the dangers of the so-called “vaccines.”
Renz said: “Despite the risk to themselves, their jobs, and slandering of their reputation if our Whistleblowers become unmasked, they are still providing us important data and information which allows us to get the appropriate facts in the public square. We need more heroes to come forward.
“The true lifesaving information is being suppressed.”
If you are a whistleblower and have credible data or information and wish to contact attorney Thomas Renz and his team, please contact them at [email protected]
- MemberAugust 7, 2021 at 8:15 pm
The Achilles Heel of Coronavirus, is while it is still in the developing stage as Coronavirus/Covid in the warm, wet areas inside the nasal passages of your head and before it gets to become Covid in your head and lungs, 10 to 14 days later. If Coronavirus is not treated with my free salt clean water cure to flush out your nasal passages, as soon as possible, or during self isolation, it becomes Covid, which is where the money is. You cannot catch Covid! Always breathe through your nose and keep your mouth shut, because you really don’t want the Coronavirus to seed itself in your lungs!! My free salt water cure has “absolutely nothing” to do with mRNA test vaccines. Treating Coronavirus with my free salt clean water cure, flushes out the nasal cavity and kills Coronavirus, before it gets to be Covid, irrespective of if you have had mRNA vaccines or not. Mix one heaped teaspoon of salt in a mug of warm or cold clean water, cup a hand and pour some of the solution in, then sniff or snort that mugful up into your nose, spitting out everything which comes down into your mouth, by so doing, you flush out your nasal cavity, where Coronavirus lives. If you get a burning sensation (which lasts for 2-3 minutes) then you have a Coronavirus infection.When the soreness goes away, blow out your head with toilet paper and flush away, washing your hands afterwards and continue doing my salt clean water nasal cavity flush cure, morning, noon and night, or more often, if you want, until, when you do my free salt water cure, you don’t experience any soreness at all in your nasal cavity. While you are at it, swallow a couple of mouthfulls and if you get a burning sensation in your chest, then you are killing the Covid/Bronchitis there too, so keep it up, each time you do a salt water sniffle, until the soreness in your head and lungs goes away – job done. Pour some of the solution on a flat surface and allow to dry and see what you have then. This is what coats the nasal passages in your head and kills Coronavirus/Covid off. You can see why it is so effective. This is what I have done for the past 26.5 years and I am NEVER ill, nor do you need to be either. Keep safe. Richard
- MemberAugust 7, 2021 at 8:16 pm
Dr Charles Hoffe Talks About Microscopic Blood Clots in the Brain, Heart and Lungs
July 15, 2021
Editor’s note: We did an article on Dr Charles Hoffe on July 12, 2021. He was the doctor from Lytton, British Columbia. Posted below is Dr Charles Hoffe MD’s latest update (July 6, 2021) reporting his disturbing findings in his patients to Laura Lynn. It is only 8 MINUTES long. He says the mRNA vaccines are plugging up thousands of tiny capillaries in the blood of those who took the ‘vaccine.’ Most will die in a few short years from heart failure. (Thanks to Gil for sending the translation)
Are the spike proteins injected, which are designed to be mass-produced in the bodies of the vaccinated, cause of the clotting? Is this having adverse effects on no fewer than 60 percent of people injected?
Dr Hoffe, who practices medicine at Lytton BC Canada explains:
Transcription from the video by John O’Sullivan, PSI
“We now know that only 25 percent of the ‘vaccine’ injected into a person’s arm actually stays in your arm. The other 75 percent is collected by your lymphatic system and literally fed into your circulation so these little packages of messenger RNA, and by the way in a single dose of Moderna ‘vaccine’ there are literally 40 trillion mRNA molecules. These packages are designed to be absorbed into your cells. But the only place they can be absorbed is around your blood vessels and the place where they are absorbed is the capillary networks – the tiniest blood vessels where the blood flow slows right down and where the genes are released. Your body then gets to work reading and then manufacturing trillions and trillions of these spike proteins. Each gene can produce many, many spike proteins. The body then recognises these are foreign bodies so it makes antibodies against it so your are then protected against COVID. That’s the idea.
“But here’s where the problem comes. In a coronavirus that spike protein becomes part of the viral capsule. In other words it becomes part of the cell wall around the virus. But it is not in a virus. It is in your cells. So it becomes part of the cell wall of your vascular endothelium. This means that these cells which line your blood vessels, which are supposed to be smooth so that your blood flows smoothly now have these little spikey bits sticking out.”
Dr Hoffe continues:
“So it is absolutely inevitable that blood clots will form because your blood platelets circulate round your blood vessels, and the purpose of blood platelets is to identify damaged vessels and stop bleeding. So, when the platelet comes through the capillary it suddenly hits all these COVID spikes and it becomes absolutely inevitable that blood clots will form to block that vessel.
“Therefore, these spike proteins can predictably cause blood clots. They are in your blood vessels (if mRNA ‘vaccinated’) so it is guaranteed. Dr Bahrdi then said to me that the way to prove this is to do a blood test called a D-dimer blood test.
“The blood clots we hear about which the media claim are very rare are the big blood clots which are the ones that cause strokes and show up on CT scans, MRI, etc. The clots I’m talking about are microscopic and too small to find on any scan. They can thus only be detected using the D-dimer test.”
Dr Hoffe explains he has been performing D-dimer tests on his mRNA ‘vaccinated’ patients and he has worryingly identified that 62 percent of them had these microscopic blood clots.
“These people have no idea they are even having these microscopic blood clots. The most alarming part of this is that there are some parts of the body like the brain, spinal cord, heart and lungs which cannot re-generate. When those tissues are damaged by blood clots they are permanently damaged.”
The result, says Dr Hoffe, is that these patients have what is termed Reduced Effort Tolerance (RET) which means they get out of breath much easily than they used to. It is because the blood vessels in their lungs are now blocked up. In turn, this causes the heart to need to work harder to try to keep up against a much greater resistance trying to get the blood through your lungs.
This is called pulmonary artery hypertension – high blood pressure in the lungs because the blood simply cannot get through effectively. People with this condition usually die of heart failure within a few short years.
In conclusion, Dr Hoffe lamented:
“These shots are causing huge damage and the worst is yet to come.”
Verification: Google Dr Charles Hoffe and Dr Bahrdi and follow the links you find there.
- MemberAugust 7, 2021 at 8:18 pm
Jim Woodgett, former Director of Research at Mount Sinai Hospital (2005-2021)
Answered May 5, 2021
The SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein encodes a 1273 amino acid protein. Multiple by 3 to get the number of nucleotides and add some untranslated regions for directing translational start and aiding in stability it rounds to approximately 5,000 nucleotides. 1 nucleotide of RNA has a mass of (averaged) of 320 Daltons. So an RNA comprised of 5,000 nucleotides has a mass of 1600 kiloDaltons.
There are 30 micrograms of RNA in a Pfizer/BioNTech single dose (in 0.3 ml). That means there are about 11.3 x 10 to the power of 12 molecules of RNA per shot.
(First shot?)11,300,000,000,000 molecules of RNA (11,300 Trillion) approximately.
The Moderna shot typically uses more RNA.
Erwin Claassen, Wetenschappelijk Huurling at Waar Niet
Answered May 5, 2021
(2nd Shot) a shitload… dose is 100µg of mRNA (not all vaccines is mRNA), that is around 505.440.000.000.000.000.000.000 copies… more or less (505,440 Trillion Trillion)
Me: Which is more mRNA particles, than the blood cells, you have in your body.
So if you have a 3rd booster that might tanslate to a further 1,010,880 Trillion, Trillion, Trillion mRNA particles in your body?
mRNa is a new treatment and has never been used in humans before, so with the above mRNA particles, why do we need blood at all?
How COVID Vaccines Deregulate Your Vascular Function
Dr.Bhakdi explains the science behind the blood disorders seen post-vaccination with gene-based COVID-19 “vaccines,” and why, in the long term, these injections may be causing dangerously overactive immune function in hundreds of millions if not billions of people.
He believes the mRNA or DNA in the vaccines are being taken up by the endothelial cells that line your blood vessels. These cells then start producing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the blood vessel wall.
“This is a disastrous situation,” Bhakdi says, “because the spike protein itself is now sitting on the surface of the cells, facing the bloodstream. It is known that these spike proteins, the moment they touch platelets, they active them [the platelets], and that sets the whole clotting system going.
The second thing that should happen, according to theory, is that the waste products of this protein that are produced in the cell, are put in front of the ‘door’ of the cell … and is presented to the immune system.
The immune system, especially the lymphocytes, recognize these and will attack the cells, because they don’t want them to make viruses or viral parts. And the viral parts are now being made in locations where viral parts would never, ever reach [naturally], like the vessel wall in your brain …
If that ‘tapestry’ of the wall [i.e., the lining of the blood vessel] is then destroyed, then that is the signal for the clotting system to [activate], and create a blood clot. And this happens with all of these vaccines because the gene [the instruction to make spike protein] is being introduced to the vessel wall.”
The fact that blood clots can occur anywhere in the body is evident from reports. For example, a 43-year-old healthy man lost a large portion of his small intestine after developing a blood clot following the AstraZeneca vaccine.14 His symptoms included headache, nausea, fever and vomiting.
A 62-year-old woman suffered blood clots in her lungs a week after the Johnson & Johnson vaccine.15 The same fate hit an 18-year-old nursing student three weeks after getting the AstraZeneca jab.16
Are the spike proteins injected, which are designed to be mass-produced in the bodies of the vaccinated, cause of the clotting? Is this having adverse effects on no fewer than 60 percent of people injected?
- MemberAugust 11, 2021 at 3:34 pm
You should have more properly cited Darryl Betts as the author of the rebuttal points.
- MemberAugust 13, 2021 at 5:27 pm
The link was in the title “ivermectin and covid 19 debunking the debunkers” at the bottom of the post
- MemberAugust 17, 2021 at 2:50 pm
👍 Appreciate that you now have properly cited Darryl Betts as the author of the rebuttal points.
- MemberAugust 13, 2021 at 6:14 pm
India showed the world ivermectin, zinc and doxycycline kits helped reduce spreading. Then the Delta variant “came from migrant workers. Still, the India rate of infections has a new trajectory, with the 10 day average nowhere resembling a spike.
There is something to learn from India and the immune systems of Indians.
Various sources (link cited) of Delta speculations:
“Vaccinated people may be less likely to catch Covid (at least for a few months until it wears off) but when vaccinated people do get infected the viral loads are pretty much the same as when unvaccinated people do. In other words, fully vaccinated people can still be dangerous to the people around them. And if they fly in without quarantine, they can bring outbreaks and new mutants too. So much for the freedom jabs. Though, in fairness, at the moment, they still offer some freedom from hospital, just not freedom from masks, quarantines, and restrictions.
Vaccination clearly isn’t going to stop the spread, eliminate the virus, or do a lot to protect your loved ones or work colleagues. It makes it hard for companies to justify mandatory vaccination “for the greater good”. The question, “Would you sit next to an unvaccinated person” isn’t quite the loaded probe it was. And you can always reply: “Would you work with someone who was Vitamin D Deficient“? I mean really, they are defenceless.
When will companies set up mass Vitamin D testing and free supplements?
A couple of weeks ago the Israeli data suggested only 16% of people were still protected from infection six months after vaccination. Presumably Governments will argue that vaccines still reduce the burden on the health care system but new mutations may render that moot too…”
[The United States media is deliberately and loyally ignorant of the benefits of Ziverdo kits.]
[Where are these folks going with this?]
“As the highly transmissible Delta variant spreads rapidly nationwide, the U.S. has ‘two weapons’to mitigate the outbreak, according to One Medical Regional Medical Director Dr. Natasha Bhuyan.
“We have two key weapons in fighting this virus: one is masks, the other is vaccines,” Dr. Natasha Bhuyan told Yahoo Finance Live. “If we can get our vaccination rates up, we will be able to slow down the spread of the virus. But until then, it’s important that even people who are fully vaccinated continue to wear a mask in indoor public settings.”
“The Delta variant, which was first identified in India, has now spread to more than 132 countries and is as contagious as chickenpox, according to an internal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document. The contagious strain now accounts for more than 80% of new coronavirus infections in the U.S. as the seven-day average of new confirmed cases has soared 150% in the past two weeks…”
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention changed its mask guidelines Tuesday for people who have been fully vaccinated against COVID-19, citing new information about the ability of the delta variant to spread by those who have been vaccinated.
The CDC is now recommending that vaccinated people wear masks indoors again in parts of the U.S. where the coronavirus is surging and that everyone in K-12 schools wear masks, regardless of vaccination status.
CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said the high transmissibility of the delta variant is behind the agency’s change in guidelines.
“Unlike the alpha variant that we had back in May, where we didn’t believe that if you were vaccinated you could transmit further – this is different now with the delta variant. And we’re seeing that now, infection is possible if you (have been vaccinated and) are a rare breakthrough infection, that you can transmit further, which is the reason for the change,” she said.
[Yet India is not panicking anymore…]
India Ministry of Health
- MemberAugust 13, 2021 at 6:25 pm
Joanne Nova of Australia goes on…
Please share and sign. Closing tonight!
Some drugs are apparently too cheap to approve.
They want us to trust them, but if they won’t investigate cheap options, they don’t appear to have our interests at heart. Who do they serve?
Even if a long-used safe cheap drug reduced infections or deaths by 10% the cost-benefits of using it are obvious for everyone (except the companies that sell expensive competing products). The studies we have suggest one antiviral (and there are many others) could reduce infections by 86% and deaths by 50% or more. The antiviral successes against Covid in India, Mexico and Peru [TheRealRestoreInc. draws your attention to these countries using ivermectin] are there for all to see. If antivirals were being used in Sydney perhaps they could have halved the Ro (or more), slowed the spread, saved lives and businesses and shortened the lockdown?
Which brings us to the awkward questions that almost no one seems to be even asking: Why aren’t cheap low risk drugs already well tested ten times over? Why aren’t the TGA and Health Ministry urgently working to fix obvious clinical vitamin deficiencies like D3? Where is the ABC and our publicly funded institutions and our academics? Isn’t the point of publicly funded universities […]
- MemberSeptember 26, 2021 at 8:49 pm
<cite>Vaccinating people who have had covid-19: why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US?</cite>
“Many of us were saying let’s use [the vaccine] to save lives, not to vaccinate people already immune,” says Marty Makary, a professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins University.
Still, the CDC instructed everyone, regardless of previous infection, to get fully vaccinated as soon as they were eligible: natural immunity “varies from person to person” and “experts do not yet know how long someone is protected,” the agency stated on its website in January.6 By June, a Kaiser Family Foundation survey found that 57% of those previously infected got vaccinated.7
As more US employers, local governments, and educational institutions issue vaccine mandates that make no exception for those who have had covid-19,8 questions remain about the science and ethics of treating this group of people as equally vulnerable to the virus—or as equally threatening to those vulnerable to covid-19—and to what extent politics has played a role.
- MemberOctober 4, 2021 at 7:14 am
The modus operandi of the CDC/NIH/big Pharma is simple: remove all semblance of a control group. As we head into the natural cycle of respiratory virus season this winter, in the minds of the controlling authorities, there can be no sizable remaining control group cohort of unvaccinated but naturally immune people faring better than those who have had the jab. They cannot risk that situation which would counter the narrative of “ vaccinate or bust” and put in jeopardy potential hundreds of billions of dollars of profits for future vaccines and expensive therapeutics .
- MemberOctober 4, 2021 at 10:12 am
Neural Lace is when nanoparticles form a web around the brain so that it picks up brainwaves but can also send wave information to the brain. Neural link picks up the frequencies from Neural Lace then amplifies them, programs the brain and connects it to a Starlink network (AI remote control). Starlink are the Satellites.These things are owned by Elon Musk. He has also been seen on video talking about graphene, one atom thick, and able to be injected. There are now claims from Pathologists about this product being found in vials. SpaceX is the delivery system for Starlink. Stranger than fiction? If this is correct then the message is to never get tested or injected because AI technology is far more advanced than we realise. CairnsNews
SpaceX’s Starlink Ramps Up, So Could Light Pollution
The constellation of internet-providing satellites is growing. Now the company and its rivals must avoid creating brighter night skies and space debris.
Photograph: Joshua Conti/Department of Defense
With some 1,800 satellites already orbiting Earth, providing internet access to about 100,000 households, SpaceX’s Starlink broadband service is poised to emerge from the beta testing phase this month, according to a recent tweet from Elon Musk, the company’s founder and CEO.
Just a decade ago, there were only a few thousand spacecraft orbiting Earth. Now Starlink engineers aim to build up to 12,000 satellites, and SpaceX launches scores more on its Falcon 9 rockets almost every month. (A recent FCC report states that the company applied for authorization for 30,000 more.) The massive network of satellites, known as a “mega-constellation,” currently dominates the satellite internet industry, but other players, like Amazon and OneWeb, have plans to launch thousands of satellites of their own.
As the Starlink fleet grows, SpaceX and its competitors will have to address some potential problems. One is that more orbiting bodies means that, eventually, there will be more space junk, creating more chances for collisions. And astronomers, environmentalists, and indigenous groups, among others, express concern that Starlink will irrevocably light up the night sky, thanks to the sunlight reflected off its satellites. For telescopes like the National Science Foundation–funded Vera C. Rubin Observatory, nearing completion in Chile, astronomers are trying to develop software to mitigate the effects of a sky filled with more private satellites, but they will inevitably leave streaks on their images of the cosmos.
SpaceX launches their internet satellites
Over the past few years, astronomers have already spotted many Starlink satellites in the night sky. “If I walk on my porch and look up at night, I’ll see a bright satellite going across the sky, and usually I’ll see several. It’s a very weird sensation: All the stars then seem to move, like an optical illusion,” says Aaron Boley, a planetary astronomer at the University of British Columbia and codirector of the Outer Space Institute. “It’s going to have a much larger effect than people appreciate.”
With the prospect of a total of some 65,000 SpaceX, Amazon, OneWeb, and Starnet/GW satellites orbiting in just a couple years, Boley and astronomer Samantha Lawler made predictions for their light pollution effects in a new research paper that’s currently going through peer review. (They aren’t affiliated with any of the satellite makers.) Based on observations and models of Starlink satellites’ brightness, they find that at latitudes near 50 degrees North and South—affecting people in Canada and Europe, for example—satellites will make up between 7 and 14 percent of lights one can see by telescope, and about one in 10 of those seen by the naked eye.
Boley and Lawler identify tradeoffs: For example, satellites orbiting at around 1,200 kilometers above Earth linger in the sky for a while, while Starlink’s satellites move more quickly in low-Earth orbit, at an altitude of less than 600 kilometers—about as high as SpaceX’s all-civilian Inspiration4 flew. Lower satellites cover less area than higher ones, so SpaceX needs more of them to reach the same number of people. But to us on Earth, they also glow more brightly in the sky.
Other industry players, who generally stick to one or the other of these ranges of orbit altitudes, include the UK’s OneWeb and planned satellite constellations like Amazon’s Project Kuiper, China’s Starnet/GW, and Canada’s Telesat. But Starlink’s constellation will likely remain the biggest one, at least for a while: SpaceX has already shipped terminals, which include a Wi-Fi router and satellite dish, to beta users in 14 countries, mainly in Western Europe and North America, including rural and remote users, according to Musk’s tweets, and the company plans to expand the user base to at least half a million.
“It’s going to be difficult to compete against SpaceX in this domain, given its obvious advantage in launch. Competitors exist and are being formed, however, suggesting that the market still sees opportunity,” wrote Matthew Weinzierl, an economist at Harvard Business School who researches the commercialization of the space sector, in an email to WIRED.
A representative from SpaceX’s communications team declined interview requests from WIRED.
But a representative from Amazon indicated the company is aware of potential light pollution issues. “Reflectivity is a key consideration in our design and development process. We’ve already made a number of design and operational decisions that will help reduce our impact on astronomical observations, and we’re engaging with members of the community to better understand their concerns and identify steps we can take,” the spokesperson wrote by email.
Katie Dowd, OneWeb’s director of government and corporate affairs in North America, wrote in an email to WIRED that the company is talking with groups, including the UK’s Royal Astronomical Society and the American Astronomical Society, to understand the effects satellites have on observations, “and to create design and operational practices that support both communities. We are also undertaking brightness measurements and will be looking at those results to explore solutions.”
SpaceX and its rivals can’t avoid light pollution; they can only reduce it. Every object in the atmosphere reflects at least some light during part of its orbit, depending on its materials, color, and size. While satellites beam information down to Earth, a tiny bit of sunlight often gets reflected down, too, both by a satellite’s body and its solar array.
Early last year, SpaceX tested a Starlink satellite nicknamed Darksat, giving it an experimental darkening coating on one side, including the antennas, to cut down on the reflective brightness, which the company claims was reduced by 55 percent. In one paper, some astronomers found that the measure did darken the satellite but not to that degree, though it made the satellite invisible to the naked eye. Others didn’t detect significant darkening at all. They found that the satellite’s measured brightness may vary, however, depending on the angle at which it’s observed and how the light scatters through the atmosphere.
According to a post on the company’s website, SpaceX found that the dark surfaces got hot, putting the satellite’s components at risk, and that it still reflected light in the infrared. So the company later tested a different approach that it calls Visorsat, deploying a number of satellites with rectangular sun shades attached, like the one used on a car windshield. Those visors are intended to make sure that sunlight that bounces off the satellites’ antennas is reflected away from Earth.
So far, SpaceX hasn’t publicly released any information about how well this approach works, or how it compares to Darksat. But another astronomer, in an unpublished paper posted on the academic preprint server arXiv.org, and Boley’s team in work-in-progress, both independently find that at least 70 percent of the Visorsat spacecraft were still brighter than their preferred threshold: a level that would ensure that the Vera C. Rubin Observatory’s images will be mostly unaffected.
To draw attention to light pollution concerns and to work on developing solutions, the American Astronomical Society convened a virtual workshop on satellite constellations this summer, known as SatCon2. They plan to soon issue reports and recommendations, coinciding with a meeting beginning this Sunday, called “Dark and Quiet Skies for Science and Society,” organized by the United Nations and the International Astronomical Union.
SatCon2 organizers made a priority of reaching out to a broad range of people concerned about the night sky, including amateur astronomers, astrophotographers, the planetarium community, environmentalists, and indigenous and tribal communities from the United States, Canada, New Zealand, and other countries. “Everybody wanted things to slow down. They want industry to engage more. This is something that belongs to everyone as a global commons,” says Aparna Venkatesan, an astrophysicist at the University of San Francisco and SatCon2 public engagement co-chair.
As part of SatCon2, a working group of astronomers spoke with representatives from SpaceX and five other major satellite operators about what reflected light limits researchers propose, and how the companies could assess and reduce how reflective their spacecraft are. They also debated policy options within the US that could involve setting rules for how much light pollution internet satellites can create. These include the possibility of regulations imposed by the Federal Aviation Administration, which sets conditions for launch and reentry, or the FCC, which licenses radio frequencies in orbit. Some astronomers also would like to see the National Environmental Policy Act to end its exemption for space—that is, they see space as an environment in need of protection.
“There is a little bit of tension, but we’re still considering both approaches: A cooperative approach, where industry really tries and we talk to them, and the possibility of getting regulations that make them try to commit to a [brightness] limit,” says Richard Green, an astronomer at the University of Arizona and chair of the SatCon2 policy working group.
In addition to light pollution, all these companies face another challenge: space junk. Their satellites could be both part of the problem and potential victims, if another spacecraft or any of the hundreds of thousands of bits of orbiting debris smashes into them.
SpaceX has the ability to move its satellites out of the way to avoid a collision, and like other companies with spacecraft in lower orbits, at the end of a satellite’s life, its engineers can bring it down into the atmosphere to burn up on reentry, says Brian Weeden, director of program planning at the Secure World Foundation, a nonpartisan think tank based in Broomfield, Colorado. “But there’s still some uncertainty there. Actively deorbiting only works if the satellite’s still functional,” he says. If, say, 2 percent of Starlink’s satellites go kaput before they can be moved or pulled down back to Earth, that still amounts to hundreds of derelict spacecraft.
And the lack of rules about who notifies whom of a potential collision, and how close is too close, and who has to move as satellite owners play chicken in space, adds to the confusion. In April, Starlink and OneWeb satellites came uncomfortably close, and in 2019, a European Space Agency satellite fired thrusters to avoid hitting a Starlink one.
The US Space Command currently monitors all pieces of space debris 10 centimeters in size or larger and calculates the odds of a space crash. “Megaconstellations and all these launch opportunities are overwhelming that system, so there’s the need to expand the capacity,” says Dan Ceperley, founder and CEO of LeoLabs, based in Menlo Park, California. Using radar systems around the globe, his company tracks space debris, including much of the small stuff, and provides data to companies that contract with them, which he says includes SpaceX.
As Starlink and other constellations grow, Boley and his colleagues hope that these companies will better address both the light pollution and debris challenges. “I hope that as they’re modifying the satellites, that the engineering is not just a matter of retrofitting, but the actual design of the satellite as a whole takes into account brightness mitigation,” Boley says.
As he points out, once those satellites go up, there will be no way for people on Earth to avoid their effects. “You can get out of the city, escape from city light pollution, and experience the night sky, but you can’t do that from satellite light pollution. There’s nowhere you would be able to go,” he says. Wired
Why does everyone have to be vaccinated by 15th October 2021?
Vaccine contents by Dr Young: https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/transmission-electron-microscopy-reveals-graphene-oxide-in-cov-19-vaccines?postId=611fb76141ab600015b9802a Well worth a read!!
Two top Pathologists reveal astonishing results of investigation into ten deaths linked to the Covid-19 Vaccines – “We’ve never seen anything like it…”
By Daily Expose on September 26, 2021
On Monday September 20th, two top pathologists held a press conference in Germany to reveal their findings of an investigation into ten deaths linked to the Covid-19 vaccines, and what they revealed is shocking.
The press conference took place at the Institute of Pathology in Reutinglen, Germany; of which Professor Arne Burkhardt has been in charge of for over eighteen years. Professor Burkhardt held the press conference alongside another experienced pathologist, Professor Walter Yang who has headed a private institute specialising in lung pathology for the past 35 years, among other appointments.
In collaboration with several other anonymous pathologists, Professor Arne Burkhardt and Professor Walter Yang investigated ten deaths that had occurred after the person had received the Covid-19 vaccine, and this is what they found…
Of the ten deaths, the two Professors confirmed that they concluded five were very likely due to the Covid-19 vaccine, two were probably related to the vaccine, one was inconclusive, and two they concluded had no relation to the Covid-19 vaccine.
However, what they found astonishing, is the similarities among the deaths that they concluded were linked to vaccination.
In three cases, they found rare autoimmune diseases; one of them so rare that they only discovered it when they looked closely at the digitised image.
They were Hashimoto’s, an autoimmune-triggered hypothyroidism; leukoclastic vasculitis, an inflammatory reaction in the capillaries that leads to skin bleeding; and Sjögren’s syndrome, an inflammation of the salivary and lacrimal glands.
Although deaths with suspected vaccine reactions are far from a representative sample of the population, three autoimmune diseases in a total of ten is a strikingly high rate.
The most striking finding, however, related to lymphocytes.
“The lymphocytes are running amok in all organs,” Professor Lang called it.
Not only did he show accumulations of lymphocytes in a wide variety of tissues, from the heart muscle to the kidney, liver, spleen, and uterus; he also showed images in which the tissue was massively attacked as a result, and a whole series of lymphocyte follicles, which are small, developing lymph nodes in completely the wrong place, for example in lung tissue.
Tissue with lymphocytic infiltration. (Blue dots: lymphocytes). The tissue is inflamed.
It also showed detachments of endothelial cells – which are the smooth cells that form the wall of blood vessels – clumps of red blood cells that ultimately cause thrombosis, and giant cells that formed around trapped foreign bodies.
Lang said he had not seen anything like these clusters of lymphocytes in hundreds of thousands of pathological studies. Normally, other white blood cells, the granulocytes, are found in inflammations. In these cases, however, these are hardly found, and instead there are masses of lymphocytes.
Detachment of endothelial cells from the vessel wall.
Further investigations are needed to determine which type of lymphocyte is involved in this process and how exactly it is triggered in order to prove a watertight connection with the vaccination; however, the histological examinations required for this would still take at least six months.
Still, he said, the results available so far are important enough to make known in advance in the form of this press conference.
Erythrocyte clumping inside a vessel. Thrombosis.
The two Professors also revealed images of unidentified foreign bodies suspected to be either contaminants or the adjuvants in the Covid-19 vaccines –
Foreign bodies which they discovered in highly inflamed lung tissue –
“We’re missing out on 90 percent,” he said of the number of fatal vaccine reactions. That is not the fault of forensic scientists and pathologists, he said; after all, you can only see what you know, and forensic medicine can’t do histological examinations anyway. But it is urgently necessary to perform more autopsies on such cases. Unfortunately, he said, that is often hindered.
“Our task is to educate people about risks and side effects,” he said of the goal of his work. A task that would actually have to be fulfilled by institutions such as the Paul Ehrlich Institute in the case of experimental vaccines with emergency approval.
The findings of the experienced pathologists from an investigation into ten deaths following Covid-19 vaccination come after another pathologist, Professor Peter Schirmacer, director of the pathological institute of the University of Heidelberg in Germany, sounded the alarm over his findings following over forty autopsies of people who died within two weeks of having a Covid-19 vaccine.
Schirmacher stated that 30 to 40 percent of people he examined died from the vaccine and that in his opinion, the frequency of fatal consequences of vaccinations is “underestimated.”
Following his findings, Schirmacher called for more autopsies of vaccinated people to further determine whether the vaccines are linked to deaths. He has warned that the high number of unreported cases of vaccination deaths is partially due to the fact that “pathologists do not notice anything about most of the patients who die after and possible from a vaccination”.
How to become a multi billionaire in the space of one day:
According to the co-founder of BioNTech Dr Ugur Sahin, the COVID-19 vaccine he designed for Pfizer was designed in just few hours in a single day on January 25, 2020.
No other vaccine in history has been created and manufactured so quickly. Previously, the fastest vaccine ever developed took more than four years. GreatGameIndia AND straight into arms without any animal testing and where we are now!!
- MemberOctober 4, 2021 at 6:45 pm
See Confirmation Bias: Depending on Your Trustworthy Party
- MemberOctober 7, 2021 at 4:50 pm
Thank you for writing this extremely important essay. You’ve really nailed what’s going on in the media and almost everywhere else lately. Really about more than just Ivermectin. What you describe is like a virus itself where this sort of narrative follows and surely by design. It’s sort of evil if you ask me. However, I’m so excited and hope I don’t end up disappointed about it later – but it’s really encouraging to see that 20+ GOP Senators signed a letter to the Biden admin and the CDC to answer for their agenda to quash all but the vaccine. I hope there is a hearing about it and they have to answer for themselves. I also hope they invite all sorts of witnesses to counter the BS they’ll likely try to stand on. IMO, you should give the introductory statement, using this as your outline and narrative of what these people are up to.
Thanks for your efforts!
- MemberOctober 9, 2021 at 4:10 pm
It is beyond alarming that these vaccines using a wholly new technique were rolled out at “warp speed”, without necessary animal studies, in total absence of long term safety studies or studies regarding target (vulnerable) sub populations , without legitimate Informed Consent (re availability of other treatments, absolute risk information, etc) and are being injected into the world population through coercion, do not appear to have any public health fail safes built in: no active (rather than passive) pharmacovigilance regarding short, mid or long term adverse events, no required hospital protocols to ascertain emergence of AEs, SAEs, and per your article, no rigorous product inspection system.
Regarding product inspection, the article points out a strict shroud of secrecy over vaccine purchase agreements and product contents, that may include even a prohibition of product inspection. All of this belies common sense and any scintilla of appropriate public health and safety oversight. Common sense and any notion of basic ethics dictates that the right of companies to assert “proprietary secrecy” over their product contents and manufacturing conditions ends when those products are being injected into people, but especially when they are being injected into people through coercion and in the absence of necessary safety testing in appropriately conducted clinical trials.
Unfortunately, there is an even larger issue of product safety that is clear when any of the products are examined under a simple light microscope , when the blood of vaccinated is examined under a simple light microscope, or when deceased vaccinated individuals’ tissues and organs are examined with careful electron microscope histology autopsy. Namely, that all products appear to have non biological foreign substances that self- assemble and self- propel, whose functionality is unknown and whose presence is not declared in their public applications for their emergency use or final approval, but whose presence is noted in autopsy in every tissue and organ and that may be associated with the unprecedented pathology profiles of the deceased, as was announced Sept 20th in a German press conference: https://pathologie-konferenz.de/en/ .
See my comments regarding their findings, posted at TSN’s article about that press conference : https://trialsitenews.com/german-press-conference-on-post-vaccine-deaths-censored/
(my comments include their key findings)