Home Unbiased and uncensored debate Covid-19 The NIH and DARPA subject to the Ninth Amendment in Trials

  • The NIH and DARPA subject to the Ninth Amendment in Trials

    Avatar IveyTech updated 1 week, 2 days ago 1 Member · 3 Posts
  • Avatar


    April 28, 2021 at 3:58 pm

    <div>The COVID-19 EUA is not for the purpose of enforceable vaccinations, neither is the Federal government, within its constitutional powers delegated to it by the Constitution, permitted to ignore the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, which draw the line of the boundary of the authority the Federal government is constitutionally allowed.</div><div>


    “Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or
    unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to
    diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or
    conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that
    there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.”




    The United States of America have been subjected to Constitutional precedent. Allowing citizens to partake in the somewhat free expression of their current Cannabis businesses (under States’ Constitutions), these activities bringing the States revenues while the Federal government stands aside due to the Ninth Amendment and the Tenth. There could be a case for similar assertions of rights to medicines for prevention of COVID-19 infections and deaths. Asserting the Ninth Amendment, we are not criminally guilty of demanding open and unsuppressed press, freedom of conscience, and the rights to exercise “those rights not enumerated, not delegated under the federal powers…”


    Seems that no lawyer wants to admit this openly, but…we are a people governed by our own consent.

    If this is not what is in our experience, we have a remedy:

    Ninth Amendment | U.S. Constitution | US Law | LII / Legal …


    The Ninth Amendment was James Madison’s attempt to ensure that the Bill of Rights was not seen as granting to the people of the United States only the specific rights it addressed. In recent years, some have interpreted it as affirming the existence of such “unenumerated” rights outside those expressly protected by the Bill of Rights.



    The current battles of COVID-19 choices are between

    healthy unvaccinated people,

    COVID-19 infected people,

    federally funded and/or affiliated civilian medical/research/administration/manufacturing/educational/media organizations,

    independent-trials medical researchers/doctors/support staffers,

    citizens as a group and as individuals,

    constitutionally bound federal branches of military/industrial/medical/researchers/security/legislators/judicial/executive personnel/logisticians,

    and others outside of the scope of this discussion.

    Beneath these battles, protecting and guiding the citizen of this nation in individual COVID-19 outcomes — is the Ninth Amendment (and the Tenth)


    Another DARPA project is rapid development of vaccines for never-before-seen viruses.

    “This is about being able to inject the cells in your muscles, say to produce antibodies automatically, for a vaccine that we’ve never seen before, and do it in 60 days or less to protect a large population,” Walker said. “This is work we’ve been funding for about 10 years at universities, and now we are going into clinical trials with this as we speak.” September 4, 2019


    During an interview with the Wall Street Journal published
    last Friday [October 16, 2020], the “captain” of Operation Warp Speed, career Big Pharma
    executive Moncef Slaoui, confirmed that the millions of Americans who
    are set to receive the project’s Covid-19 vaccine will be monitored via
    “incredibly precise . . . tracking systems” that will “ensure that
    patients each get two doses of the same vaccine and to monitor them for
    adverse health effects.” Slaoui also noted that tech giants Google and
    Oracle have been contracted as part of this “tracking system” but did
    not specify their exact roles beyond helping to “collect and track
    vaccine data.”

    Google And Oracle Will Track The Vaccinated With ‘Incredibly Precise’ Tech

    But DARPA…

    (and the NIH)

    …the law of the land is to keep you in your boundaries:

    The Ninth Amendment.

    Amendment IX

    The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

    and the Tenth.

    Amendment X

    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

    Unconstitutional is the suppression of medical research and the disallowing of testimonial evidence of any agent found independently to be efficacious against COVID-19.

    UnConstitutional Laws Are NO Laws at all!

    The U.S. Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, and any statue, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows: The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.” “Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it…. A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it superseded thereby.

    No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177.

    “All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution, are null and void.” Chief Justice Marshall, Marbury v. Madison, 5, U.S. (Cranch) 137, 174,176

  • Avatar


    April 29, 2021 at 12:33 pm

    PRIVATE CORPORATIONS are losing as quasi-governmental censors.



    Censorship Defined

    Censorship is the suppression or prohibition of words, images, or ideas that are considered offensive, obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security (Sources: Lexico and ACLU). The First Amendment Encyclopedia notes that “censors seek to limit freedom of thought and expression by restricting spoken words, printed matter, symbolic messages, freedom of association, books, art, music, movies, television programs, and internet sites” (Source: The First Amendment Encyclopedia).

    Censorship by the government is unconstitutional. When the government engages in censorship, it goes against the First Amendment rights discussed above. However, there are still examples of government censorship in our history (see the 1873 Comstock Law and the 1996 Communications Decency Act), and the Supreme Court is often called upon to ensure that First Amendment rights are being protected.

    Private individuals and groups still often engage in censorship. As long as government entities are not involved, this type of censorship technically presents no First Amendment implications.


    Free Speech Online and on Social Media

    The widespread use of the internet, and particularly social media platforms, has presented new challenges in defining what types speech are protected by the First Amendment. Social Media platforms are private companies, and we learned above that private companies are legally able to establish regulations and guidelines within their communities–including censorship of content or banning of members.

    – – – – –


    Government officials routinely use social media to communicate policy, advocate positions, introduce new legislation, and various other functions. When government officials create a designated public forum on these social media platforms, First Amendment controversies arise, particularly when government officials attempt to shut down or silence opposing viewpoints.

    Certainly, government officials have the ability to use social media to advocate and engage in their own expression. This expression becomes the speech of the government under the government speech doctrine, a doctrinal principle in First Amendment law that recognizes that government has the ability to be an active participant in the marketplace of ideas. In other words, the government alone has the power to control its content.

    Government officials may run afoul of First Amendment if it tries to censor certain viewpoints

    However, once the government creates a forum that allows persons to comment and criticize, the government may run into First Amendment hurdles if it tries to censor those expressions.

    Free-speech scholar Helen Norton explains in her book The Government’s Speech and the Constitution: “But once the government chooses a platform that permits public comment, it has created a type of forum for nongovernmental parties’ speech, and it is now bound by traditional First Amendment principles when regulating the speech of the commenters on the problem.” (55).

    – – – – –


    S. 913: COVID–19 Disinformation Research and Reporting Act of 2021

  • Avatar


    April 29, 2021 at 9:40 pm

    Study Director:

    Sabine Hazan, MD


    Study Director:

    Thomas Borody, MD

    Topelia Therpeutics

    Contact: Thomas Borody, MD

    +61-2-9713 4011

    [email protected]

    Contact: Jordan Daniels, MS


    [email protected]


    Will the NIH publish the results of this trial if it turns out positive? Will the NIH recommend the protocol that is used in this study for the general public?

    Detailed Description:

    Patients in this trial will undergo treatment for 10 days with either a combination of therapies or placebo. They will then be followed for 6 months.

    Study Design

    Drug: Ivermectin

    Treatment day 1 and day 4

    Other Name: Soolantra, Stromectol, Sklice

    Drug: Doxycycline Hcl

    10 day treatment

    Other Name: Doxy-100, Monodox, Oracea, Targadox, Acticlate, Morgidox, Avidoxy, Doryx MPC, Mondoxyne NL, Dory

    Dietary Supplement: Zinc

    10 Day treatment

    Other Name: Zinc sulphate

    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3

    10 day treatment

    Other Name: cholecalciferol-D3

    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin C

    10 day treatment

    Other Name: L-ascorbic acid

    Experimental: Active Arm

    Patients will be treated with a combination of Ivermectin, Doxycycline, Zinc, Vitamin D3 and Vitamin C


    Drug: Ivermectin
    Drug: Doxycycline Hcl
    Dietary Supplement: Zinc
    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3
    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin C

    Placebo Comparator: Placebo

    Placebo and Vitamin D3, Vitamin C, and Zinc


    Dietary Supplement: Zinc
    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3
    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin C

Log in to reply.

Original Post
0 of 0 posts June 2018