- MemberJune 20, 2021 at 3:19 pm
In this clip Saagar Enjeti and Krystal Ball talk about the lab leak theory. Around 6 minutes in, Enjeti makes the point Fauci is in control of University funding. If a professor speaks or and makes Fauci mad, he can cut that professors grant funding. That will cost the professor his job. https://youtu.be/__Czlg1xLJA
Again Fauci predicted there would be a pandemic back in 2017https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aBokl_eNSAo&feature=youtu.be
- MemberSeptember 19, 2021 at 2:40 pm
<div>Nobody reads our discussions so we can reply to each other and keep them alive.</div><div>
Here is a bit about Fauci in the middle of it, but not running it – other players are at the top of it
The most unbelievable portions of Dr. Martin’s deposition testimony have to do with the timing. Multiple patents on both coronavirus and its treatment were filed years before anyone should have known about the disease – before it even officially existed.
While the SARS outbreak occurred in Asia beginning in November 2002, Dr. Martin discovered a patent for the causative virus, SARS, filed seven months earlier. Therefore, it should not have pre-existed the outbreak UNLESS there was foul play.
US Patent number 7279327 was filed in conjunction with the NIAID (Dr. Fauci) and Dr. Ralph Baric (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) on April 19, 2002.
This pre-existing patented pathogen was described as an infectious coronavirus that afflicted human lung tissue and involved a Spike protein and an ACE-2 receptor. Dr. Martin considers this conclusive evidence that “we made SARS,” and it did not arise out of nature from zoonotic transfer as we have been led to believe.
See mark 8:35 https://www.bitchute.com/video/9HxsE5llViby/
Dr. Martin states, “The NIAID built an infectious, replication-defective coronavirus. It was specifically targeted for human lung epithelium. In other words, we made SARS. And we patented it on April 19, 2002 – before there was ever any alleged outbreak in Asia – which followed that by several months…
That patent clearly lays out in very specific gene sequencing the fact that we knew the ACE receptor, the ACE-2 Binding Domain, the S1 Spike Protein, and other elements of what we have come to know as this scourge pathogen that was not only engineered but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory, using nothing more than gene sequencing technologies, taking computer code, and turning it into a pathogen or an intermediate of the pathogen.
And that technology was funded exclusively in the early days as a means by which you could harness coronavirus as a vector to distribute HIV vaccine.”
Peter Daszak was discussing ways to monetize the coronavirus vaccine as early as 2016. On February 12, 2016, Daszak stated,
“We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”
- MemberSeptember 19, 2021 at 5:38 pm
- MemberSeptember 21, 2021 at 6:32 am
2005 GHIS, DARPA(April14th interview with 60 minutes), WHO JEE , NAPHS, WORLD BANK
- MemberSeptember 28, 2021 at 9:48 pm
“Nobody reads our discussions so we can reply to each other and keep them alive.”
This is an issue I raised quite some time ago. Everyone seems to want to pigeon-hole themselves in these micro groups and share volumes of valid information without ever having a single strategic or tactical conversation about what we can all do to act in a manner different than we ever have before.
We can talk about what we know until the Ivermectin cows come home but until we organize and act in a manner differently than we always have, “they,” (our government, the hidden hand) will simply do what they have always done.
In my view, and I have expressed this to others, until we can get say 1,000 participants to act in unison every single day, taking identical digital actions as they do with their media parroting we will remain divided and easy targets. If I write to RachelMaddow or Bernie Sanders it is ignored, if 1,000 people wrote to them at the exact same time tommorow and the next day and the next day – it would ultimately have to be addressed.
Robert Malone posting on twitter, even with 3,000 shares isn’t going to do anything but put him in harms way. But the exact same post originating from 1,000 people at the same time and to the same media would change the dynamic and provide him and us with leverage, with a weapon that would gain in strength as others joined in.
I’ve done this before on a smaller scale (12,000 people) as a live event producer for 20 years and it creates a movement. A digital protest if you will.
I call it a #SynchronizedHumanMumuration.
The sad reality is people seem more interested in writing books and starting blogs or somehow monetizing this catastrophe and thereby DOING NOTHING of real value or impact.
Solutions abound, but execution is non-existent.
911 was clearly an inside job just like this is and look at how that turned out. Just the other day a Democratic President refused to release classified documents regarding a Republican presidents #CrimesAgainstHumanity.
Personally I am surprised a dozen high profile people haven’t committed suicide by shooting themselves in the back of the head and then jumping in a river.
For anyone who doesn’t know, nearly 90 doctors who discovered a cure for cancer ended up dead in less than a year, if we don’t begin to act differently I am afraid we are going to start seeing the same thing.
We have the evidence but we are not holding anyone to account in a way that moves the dial.
Just my observation.
- MemberSeptember 29, 2021 at 12:04 am
Absolutely and totally true! I agree 100% to everything you are saying. Please start a plan of action and let’s make it happen.
Thank you for your great intervention.