Home Unbiased and uncensored debate Covid-19 “…diagnose, prevent, treat or cure…”

  • “…diagnose, prevent, treat or cure…”

     IveyTech updated 2 weeks ago 1 Member · 4 Posts
  • IveyTech

    May 8, 2021 at 12:52 pm

    Is Dr. Pierre Kory going to be arrested and imprisoned? Dr. Kory’s statement on ivermectin, according to Google is

    content that contradicts WHO or local health authorities’ guidance on:




    Americans Dying While Bureaucrats Nap – (Part 1 …


    “If you take it you will not get sick.” Dr. Kory related the information contained in a very recent study about the use of ivermectin from Argentina. He said, “They prophylaxed 800 health care workers, not one got sick. In the 400 that didn’t prophylax, 59% or 237 of those 400 got sick.”



    Ivermectin and “Vitamin” D

    …have a synergistic effect and enhance the immune system, therefore having as much place in a COVID-19 cure and an ending of the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and variants as the vaccine campaign?



    Ivermectin, an anti-parasitic drug, can also attach to the receptor binding domain of the viral spike protein, blocking its connection with ACE2.[110] In randomized trials, ivermectin was shown to prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to health care workers[111] and family members[112] in contact with patients who have Covid-19.


    Vitamin D has to be one of science’s most misunderstood vitamins. For a start, it is not actually a vitamin, but a prohormone, which means that it is converted into a hormone by our body.

    Why should YOU say that something that is synergistic with the immune system and is essential to immune function “is not intended to diagnose, prevent, treat or cure” COVID-19?

    The United States Bill of Rights


    “The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

    But Congress has passed a cumbersome, unconstitutional Act,

    Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994
    Public Law 103-417
    103rd Congress

    I will post an excerpt at the bottom.


    The term “dietary supplement” –

    “(1) means a product (other than tobacco) intended to supplement the
    diet that bears or contains one or more of the following dietary ingredients:

    “(A) a vitamin;
    “(B) a mineral;
    “(C) an herb or other botanical;
    “(D) an amino acid;
    “(E) a dietary substance for use by man to supplement the diet by increasing
    the total dietary intake; or
    “(F) a concentrate, metabolite, constituent, extract, or combination
    of any ingredient described in clause (A), (B), (C), (D), or (E);

    “(2) means a product that –

    “(A)(i) is intended for ingestion in a form described in section 411(c)(1)(B)(i);
    “(ii) complies with section 411(c)(1)(B)(ii);
    “(B) is not represented for use as a conventional food or as a sole
    item of a meal or the diet; and
    “(C) is labeled as a dietary supplement; and

    “(3) does –

    “(A) include an article that is approved as a new drug under section
    505, certified as an antibiotic under section 507, or licensed as a biologic
    under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262) and
    was, prior to such approval, certification, or license, marketed as a
    dietary supplement or as a food unless the Secretary has issued a regulation,
    after notice and comment, finding that the article, when used as or in
    a dietary supplement under the conditions of use and dosages set forth
    in the labeling for such dietary supplement, is unlawful under section
    402(f); and
    “(B) not include –

    “(i) an article that is approved as a new drug under section 505,
    certified as an antibiotic under section 507, or licensed as a biologic
    under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262),
    “(ii) an article authorized for investigation as a new drug, antibiotic,
    or biological for which substantial clinical investigations have been
    instituted and for which the existence of such investigations has been
    made public,

    which was not before such approval, certification, licensing, or authorization
    marketed as a dietary supplement or as a food unless the Secretary, in the
    Secretary’s discretion, has issued a regulation, after notice and comment,
    finding that the article would be lawful under this Act.

  • IveyTech

    May 13, 2021 at 11:55 am

    What’s in a name?

    Panax Ginseng consumption has been considered to improve overall health,
    reduce the susceptibility to illness, and promote longevity, as its
    name “panax” means “cure-all” in Greek.

    Eric Nepute, D.C., made a video about Vitamin D in 2017, long before COVID-19 became the lightning rod of calling out people for fake cures. The lawsuit is over words and advertising about whether Vitamin D worked better than a vaccine…

    United States of America, Plaintiff v. Quickwork LLC, a limited
    liability company also d/b/a Wellness Warrior, and Eric Anthony Nepute,
    individually and as owner of QuickWork LLC, Defendants.

    FTC Matter/File Number:

    202 3188

    Civil Action Number:


    Federal Court:

    Eastern District of Missouri

    Case Summary

    In April 2021, the FTC charged St. Louis-based chiropractor Eric Anthony Nepute and his company Quickwork LLC with violating the COVID-19 Consumer Protection Act and the Federal Trade Commission Act, by deceptively marketing products containing vitamin D and zinc as scientifically proven to treat or prevent COVID-19. This is the first such case in which the agency has sought civil penalties.



    ” It is libellous to make unequivocal statements that a product cannot diagnose, prevent, treat or cure disease when real-world evidence and real-world data has shown otherwise”

    instead of

    “*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug
    Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure,
    or prevent any disease.”

    So Eric Nepute said that his product could possibly prevent, treat or cure COVID-19?

    Did that become a crime because of unconstitutional laws?

    Why would a company like Shaklee Corporation sell “Triple Defense Boost” WITHOUT the INTENT to treat, cure, or prevent a human ailment? Make money?

    Shaklee’s product has Vitamin D/Vitamin C/Zinc/Quercetin/Etc. but is careful to toe the line about claims of helping your COVID-19 symptoms.

    <div>7 Patents/Patents Pending


    The botanical blend in Triple Defense Boost has seven patents/patents pending

    3x Increase in Natural
    Killer Cell Activity

    3x increase in Natural Killer cell activity by the immune-boosting blend*<sup>†</sup>

    5.8x Increase in Critical Immune Cells

    The immune-boosting blend increases the proliferation of other critical immune cells by 5.8x*<sup>†</sup>

    Power your immune system with a great-tasting berry-flavored drink mix,
    packed with vitamins C and D, zinc, plant-based adaptogens, elderberry,
    and more. Supports, boosts, and defends your immune system, with
    ingredients shown to boost Natural Killer cell activity by 3x and
    critical immune cells by 5.8x


    How can they make such specific claims and why do they, if they are forced by Congress to have to make a false confession that the product is “not intended” to do anything that useful? Maybe just an assist to your better health, but not, heaven forbid — “diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure” — disease?

    Why is Dr. Kory’s free speech suppressed and misconstrued by Science Based Medicine Org., for real-world evidence-based testimonials and clinical trials that show that ivermectin can prevent the spread of SARS-CoV2?


    “Ivermectin is to SARS-CoV-2 as glyohosate is to dandelion weeds”

    Does Roundup (glyphosate)by Monsanto… prevent, treat, or cure weeds from growing? Yes…

    And Bayer owns Monsanto, who in turn owns the seeds that produce the plants that many of the USA food products corporations sell us in a processed form.

    Here is the list of companies and brands that are either owned by Monsanto, or are known to use genetically modified seeds sold by Monsanto:


    Aunt Jemima
    Aurora Foods
    Best Foods
    Betty Crocker
    Capri Sun
    Chef Boyardee
    ConAgra Foods
    Delicious Brands cookies
    Duncan Hines
    Famous Amos
    Flowers Industries
    Frito Lay
    General Mills
    Green Giant
    Healthy Choice
    Hungry Jack
    Interstate Bakeries
    KC Masterpiece
    Kid Cuisine
    Lean Cuisine
    Loma Linda Foods
    Marie Callender’s
    Minute Maid
    MorningStar Farms
    Mrs. Butterworth’s
    Nature Valley
    Ocean Spray
    Orville Redenbacher’s
    Pepperidge Farm
    Philip Morris
    Pop Secret
    Post cereals
    PowerBar brand
    Procter & Gamble
    Rice-A-Roni & Pasta Roni
    Weight Watchers Smart Ones
    Tombstone frozen pizza
    Uncle Ben’s

    68 Monsanto-Owned Companies to Boycott


    So why does Congress write laws to force therapeutic supplement companies to DENY the INTENT to treat disease when the companies market their products?

    It is not truth.

    It is a statement made under threat and duress, forced testimony that is not going to stand in an honest court of Constitutional law.

    Say it: ivermectin is anti-viral.

    Ivermectin is the new hydroxychloroquine

    Ivermectin has been touted as a potential antiviral to treat COVID-19 infections. There is no good evidence it is effective.

    Scott Gavura on April 15, 2021


    “Ivermectin is the New Hydroxychloroquine”…an ignorant statement.

    “…With the arrival of safe and effective vaccines to prevent COVID-19,
    bringing what looks like a pathway to a post-pandemic world, I wasn’t
    sure if it was still worth looking at unproven COVID-19 treatments.
    After all, it’s been over a year and we have much more knowledge about
    what actually works to prevent and treat SARS-CoV-2 infections. But
    amazingly there are still very passionate supporters of treatments that
    lack any strong evidence of benefit. Ivermectin falls into that

    Time to remove that month-old article, Scott.

    Try this one.

    [Coincidentally, VAERS database entries for COVID-19 vaccinations show that there are deaths and adverse reactions, possibly indicating that THE CDC is the granddaddy of making false claims to the public]


    COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective.

    Millions of people in the United States have received COVID-19
    vaccines under the most intense safety monitoring in U.S. history.

    CDC recommends you get a COVID-19 vaccine as soon as possible.

    Many people have reported only mild side effects after COVID-19 vaccination.

    [Omission of VAERS data does harm to the credibility of the CDC]

    Serious safety problems are rare

    To date, the systems in place to monitor the safety of these vaccines have found only two serious types of health problems after vaccination, both of which are rare. These are anaphylaxis and thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) after vaccination with J&J/Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine.

    Long-term side effects are unlikely

    Serious side effects that could cause a long-term health problem are extremely unlikely following any vaccination, including COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccine monitoring has historically shown that side effects generally happen within six weeks of receiving a vaccine dose. For this reason, the FDA required each of the authorized COVID-19 vaccines to be studied for at least two months (eight weeks) after the final dose. Millions of people have received COVID-19 vaccines, and no long-term side effects have been detected.

    CDC continues to closely monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. If scientists find a connection between a safety issue and a vaccine, FDA and the vaccine manufacturer will work toward an appropriate solution to address the specific safety concern (for example, a problem with a specific lot, a manufacturing issue, or the vaccine itself).

    Help protect yourself and others by getting vaccinated


    Results returned for ivermectin trials

    Must include ivermectin clinical trials Clear All

    We are only including results from the COVID-19 site.

    Do you want to see results from all sites?

    Interim Clinical Considerations for Use of COVID-19 Vaccines | CDC


    Find interim clinical considerations for the use of COVID-19 vaccines for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States.

    Clinical Questions about COVID-19: Questions and Answers | CDC


    Get Vaccinated: Find a vaccine and learn what you can do after you’re fully vaccinated. What are you looking for? × COVID-19 Risk Who is at risk for infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19?

    But don’t take ivermectin…it doesn’t exist.

  • IveyTech

    May 13, 2021 at 12:48 pm

    Reporting of vaccine adverse events

    <b align=”center”>From the 4/30/2021 release of VAERS data:
    Found 3,837 cases where Vaccine is COVID19 and Patient Died

    Adverse events that occur in a recipient following COVID-19 vaccination should be reported to VAERS. Vaccination providers are required by the FDA to report the following that occur after COVID-19 vaccination under EUA:

    Vaccine administration errors

    Serious adverse events

    Cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome

    Cases of COVID-19 that result in hospitalization or death


    Reporting is encouraged for any other clinically significant adverse event, even if it is uncertain whether the vaccine caused the event. Information on how to submit a report to VAERS is available at https://vaers.hhs.govexternal icon or by calling 1-800-822-7967.

    In addition, CDC has developed a new voluntary, smartphone-based tool, v-safe. This tool uses text messaging and web surveys to provide near real-time health check-ins after patients receive COVID-19 vaccination. Reports to v-safe indicating a medically significant health impact, including pregnancy, are followed up by the CDC/v-safe call center to collect additional information to complete a VAERS report, if appropriate.


    At the CDC search, ivermectin does not exist…only in the past did it exist.

    Over 30 Years: The Mectizan® Donation Program

    Could ivermectin have been used to prevent some of these VAERS reported deaths, if ivermectin existed to the CDC?

    <header>Ivermectin, a new candidate therapeutic against SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19

    Khan Sharun, Kuldeep Dhama, […], and Hakan Leblebicioglu

    Additional article information


    Associated Data

    The recent report by Caly et al., describing the antiviral potential of ivermectin against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in vitro arrive to the agenda of potential candidates for COVID-19 treatment [1]. This discovery gave hope to the researchers who are screening for drugs that can be repurposed for treating the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).


    <header><b data-test=”article-title” data-article-title=””>Ivermectin, antiviral properties and COVID-19: a possible new mechanism of action
    Emanuele Rizzo

    <i data-test=”journal-title”>Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology <b data-test=”journal-volume”>volume 393, pages1153–1156(2020)

    Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug that has shown also an effective
    pharmacological activity towards various infective agents, including
    viruses. This paper proposes an alternative mechanism of action for this
    drug that makes it capable of having an antiviral action, also against
    the novel coronavirus



    Practice compassionate therapeutic prophylaxis.


  • IveyTech

    May 31, 2021 at 7:17 am

    The “violation”


    …and saying “diagnose” or “prevent” or “treat” or “cure”…


    We don’t take supplements for “informational purposes only”.


    Natural Sources of Glutathione – Plant-Based Diet …


    “Asparagus is the highest plant-based source of glutathione. Okra is also naturally high and assists in the elimination of the mucoid plaque in the small intestines. Rice bran, high in Alpha Lipoic Acid (ALA) promotes the synthesis of glutathione in the body.”

    The most highly educated medical minds are blinded by their own “brilliance”.

    They don’t all act that way. Some doctors who see the goodness of medicine without the tyranny of following policy orders are cast out and spit on, figuratively, for being more humbly brilliant than the peer-reviewed, peer-controlled variety of Healers.

    If a product promotes healing we don’t idolize it, we just use it – as in the case of Ivermectin.

    But tyrannical tendencies come when Good Doctors won’t promote healing from alternatives to the pharmaceutica companies’ currently fashionable offerings.

    What is the latest marketing tactic to get you to “ask your doctor about” the latest XYZ mumab drug?

    Why not ask your doctor about ivermectin and fluvoxamine and glutathione?

    NAC’s Crucial Role in Preventing and Treating COVID-19


    “As reported by Natural Products Insider, 38 there are at least 1,170 NAC-containing products in the National Institutes of Health’s Dietary Supplement Label Database.”

    Stand up for Dr. Mercola in this censoring, delusional, anti Ninth Amendment climate of tyrannical good intentions…


Log in to reply.

Original Post
0 of 0 posts June 2018