MemberMay 22, 2021 at 4:49 pm
“In recent years, air pollution in mainland China has become more and more serious. In order to reduce air pollution index level, the CCP authorities have used various methods to falsify air quality data. Putting “masks” on environmental monitoring detector is just one example.
The CCP authorities have no way to deal with air pollution. In order to achieve air pollution reduction targets, local governments have applied various kinds of “methods” on air pollution data. On April 28, the director of Yaomeng Sub-district Office, Pingdingshan City in Henan Province, Liu Sufang, deputy director Yu Honglei, and head of the Environmental Protection Agency Wang Junkui were charged of the fraudulent practices, it’s exposed in a report by the Henan Commission for Discipline Inspection.
According to the report, in May 2020, Wang Junkui noticed that the air pollution index detected by Yaomeng Office had increased. To reduce the index level, medical cotton was illegally used to block the monitoring holes of environmental detectors, resulting in inaccurate data collection.
It is not the first time that government officials have been exposed to have put “masks” on air detectors.
In 2016, the Ambient Air Automatic Monitoring Station of Chang An District (under Xi’an Environmental Protection Agency, Shanxi Province) was brought to light that it used cotton yarn to block the filter of sampler, which resulted in the data distorted.
According to data released by the WHO, 10 million people worldwide died of cancer in 2020. In China, the incidence and mortality of lung cancer ranks the first among malignant tumors. As early as in 2016, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province ranked the first among the most polluted cities in China. The Henan Business Daily reported that official data showed that the annual incidence of malignant tumors in Henan Province has reached 250,000 and the death toll has reached 160,000, which is equivalent to 28 people being diagnosed with cancer every hour. Lung cancer ranks the first in terms of both morbidity and mortality.”
This kind of official behavior revealed above is a precedent to open the investigation into SX45/SXC21, bat coronavirus and rotavirus with peculiar similarities to SARS-CoV-2. Military virology research, military pandemic drills and the Event 201 preparatory meetings are being omitted from the public so there is an open season for investigating the links and correspondence
Lawrence Sellin has the following working hypothesis about anomalies:
“The COVID-19 virus has a number of unique structural features that cannot be explained as products of a natural evolutionary process.
Those anomalies primarily affect the COVID-19 virus’ extraordinarily high infectivity rate of +100,000,000 compared to, for example, the 8,096 in the first 2002-2004 SARS pandemic.
That increase in infectivity is directly related to the enhanced ability of the COVID-19 virus to bind to and enter human cells, both of which can be achieved by laboratory manipulation.
The COVID-19 virus binds to human cells 10-20 times better than the 2002-2004 SARS virus (1,2).
From the beginning, the COVID-19 virus appeared to be well-adapted (3,4) even pre-adapted (5) for binding to human cells.
The COVID-19 virus did not undergo the same mutation and adaptation to humans over time as did the 2002-2004 SARS virus, but was already, from the beginning, resembling late-stage SARS infections, suggesting pre-adaptation (5).
Such pre-adaption for human infection can be accomplished in the laboratory by repeatedly exposing coronaviruses to genetically-engineered mice that have the human receptor, a process known as serial passage.
Since 2007, Chinese scientists have used humanized mouse models to experiment with coronaviruses starting with the 2002-2004 SARS virus (6).
The second unique feature of the COVID-19 virus affecting infectivity is the presence of a furin polybasic cleavage site, a structure that facilitates membrane fusion between the virus and human cells.
The furin polybasic cleavage site is essential for human infection (7) and is a structure known by Chinese scientists to also enhance pathogenicity (8), but a structure not found in any bat coronaviruses closely related to the COVID-19 virus (7).
The unique COVID-19 virus polybasic cleavage site insertion is a short sequence of the amino acids, proline-arginine-arginine-alanine or “PRRA.”
The combination of genomic nucleotides that codes for the two joint arginines (RR), a double cytosine-guanine-guanine or CGG-CGG sequence is extremely rare, being the only instance of it in the entire COVID-19 viral genome (9).
In addition, the presence of the structurally rigid amino acid proline in the PRRA insert is also unusual. It causes the furin polybasic cleavage site to protrude from the surrounding structure making it more accessible to the enzymes on the human cell surface, thereby facilitating virus entry.
Coupled with the surrounding structure, insertion of a rigid proline could increase antigenicity, making vaccine development easier, but such a feature is not advantageous to a virus undergoing natural evolution.
In 2004, at the end of the first SARS pandemic, a U.S. patent, entitled “Inserton of Furin Protease Cleavage Sites in Membrane Proteins and Uses Thereof” was filed describing how furin polybasic cleavage sites could be artificially inserted into viruses.
During the 17 years since that patent was filed, it has only been cited 23 times, one of which was by Chinese People’s Liberation Army-trained scientists Shibo Jiang and Shuwen Liu, who, in 2013, were artificially inserting furin polybasic cleavage sites in experiments involving viruses (10).”
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is retired from an international career in business and medical research with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq.
Dr. Sellin considers that SX45 and SXC21 should be part of the investigation into origins of SARS-CoV-2.
Dr. Li-Meng Yan writes:
“The evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 should be a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a template and/or backbone.”
Where will this investigation lead?
MemberMay 23, 2021 at 1:39 pm
Discussion title should be “ZC45 not ZX.
I miss the EDIT button that was available in this Community in a previous manifestation.
MemberMay 23, 2021 at 9:51 pm
Log in to reply.