CDC Shares VAERS for COVID-19 Vaccines: 12,313 Reports of Deaths but No Causal Link According to Agency

CDC Shares that VAERS for COVID-19 Vaccines: 12,313 Reports of Deaths but No Causal Link According to Agency

Recently, the chatter online about deaths associated with COVID-19 vaccines was confirmed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) between the dates of December 14, 2020, through July 19, 2021, based on entries into the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Apparently, the CDC has shared publicly that the federal health agency has received 12,313 individual reports of actual death among those who have received one of the COVID-19 vaccines—that is, one of the vaccines under Food and Drug Administration (FDA) emergency use authorization (EUA). That’s overall a small number when accounting for the 338 million doses of the vaccines administered across America, representing a death rate of only 0.0036%. On the other hand, this is an unprecedented number of fatalities when compared to any other vaccination initiative over the past few decades given it’s only been available for just over half a year.

As of July 22, the CDC now reports that this number was a mistake and the revised number is 6,207.

A system to track safety reports, the cases are open to the public. However, TrialSite has published that about 60% of the VAERS cases are submitted by health care professionals. But it is an open system that is overseen by the CDC in conjunction with the FDA. TrialSite encourages transparency and open dialogue, including scientific debate and a number of OpEd articles questioning the number of deaths associated with the current batch of COVID-19 vaccines.

Interestingly, the website was updated to include 12,313 deaths as is depicted in the image below. A recent visit to the website now declares 6,207 deaths.

Result from Google Search 3 days ago:

Selected Adverse Events Reported after COVID-19 … › 2019-ncov › vaccines › safety3 days ago — During this time, VAERS received 12,313 reports of death (0.0036%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine.

CDC: No Causal Link

The CDC has stated that based on a review of the relevant information, including the death certificates, medical records, etc., the agency has declared that there are no causal links between the reports and the vaccine. Hence the federal government is on record that there are no direct ties between the events.  

Timing of Deaths

Independent analyses have demonstrated that a sizable number of the total reported deaths have occurred within 36 hours of the administration of the vaccine. However, the government won’t acknowledge any correlation—that’s the formal declaration for now. Suffice to say, there are many questions; a more detailed analysis of the government’s findings would be a positive disclosure. Transparency, particularly with novel drugs and cutting-edge vaccines still under investigational classification (e.g. emergency use authorization), is a sound policy following good ethical practices.


  1. Thank goodness the CDC isn’t in law enforcement. Imagine when bodies started piling up on someone’s property. The CDC would quickly squash any ridiculous talk of a serial killer. Fauci would stand at his podium to scold us and remind us not to challenge his omnipotence.
    “These people would likely have died whether they had run into Mr Dahmer or not. We’ve looked into all of these deaths and determined none of them have any connection to Mr. Dahmer. We are working closely with local law enforcement to flag problematic fb posts suggesting Mr Dahmer might be a serial killer.”

  2. This is absurd. How can almost half of the reports in VAERS be a ‘mistake’? Is TrialSiteNews following up on this with CDC?
    Also, NO casual links between the vaccines and the remaining deaths? This is in stark contrast to other national health authorities that have conducted causality assessments with AERs and the vaccines and attributed some deaths to vaccine administration. This all smells like a coverup.

  3. Very interesting reading, with noted Vaccine side effects and why?

    Covid & Vaccine = Bio-Weapons Print Out & READ 3 Pages!!
    This guy spoke without the hospital where he worked’s, permission, so they sacked him, then they black listed him and his public rant and then another doctor on behalf of the hospital withdrew his complaint, his only other source of income now, as doctor of his own practice (50% loss of income) in the town of Lytton which was burned to the ground shortly afterwards and now he has no income at all – but he is sticking to his story and has not deviated an inch from it.

    With the PDF above by an MD in Biological Research, etc, would you believe what HE says in his research paper, with what Dr Hoffe has reported, above?

    With 3.5 billion vaccinated world wide and a total population of 7.5 billion, I fear the vaccinations have a life of their own and nothing can stop many people being vaccinated, with it seems for Covid which is a bio weapon, as are the vaccines.

    It has been suggested by Dr.Hoffe that 60% will die sooner (about 2 years so I understand from something I saw from another website) and the other 40% (about 3 years) because what is the point in only 60% dying when you can kill off the whole lot, just scatter the deaths to make them less obvious, perhaps.

    People’s apathy, this time, could very well be their downfall, I am very sorry to say.

  4. It looks like the 0.0036% fatality rate cited for vaccines is PER DOSE, which is good to know. Were the deaths reported to VAERs ever divided into whether it happened after the first or second shot? When I consider the risk PER PERSON that number doubles:

    With 49% of the entire pop of Americans vaccinated, and another 8% halfway there and with 338 million doses administered, some as one shot and the majority as two, wouldn’t the fatality rate be more representative of individual risk when DOUBLED? That’s still a low rate but I wonder how it would compare to the rate of Covid deaths if the same resistance to applying the label was observed as it is with vaccines.

  5. Well, I wonder if this is in keeping with CDCs methods of determining Covid as COD, but in reverse. According to their database, 95% of those that died from or with (great way to inflate numbers) Covid had comorbidities, hypertension being the number one comorbidity. I recall a personal account: her neighbor was extremely obese, was diabetic and had other serious issues, drank soda and beer all day, ate junk food and a lot of it, hardly moved, smoked. But died of Covid. With the vaccine, on the other hand, it seems like unless you pretty much drop dead in the 20-minute window in front of staff AND have NO comorbidities to blame your death on, it’s NOT the vaccine. The CDC and FDA started this pandemic with my full trust but have managed to lose it all in the course of a year and a half.

  6. Got to love when the government and big pharma are working together. How is it statistically plausible that of all the injuries and deaths being reported to VAERS and EudraVigilance, there are “no” causations due to the Covid-19 inoculations? The U.S. has already paid out over $4.5 billion in claims from other vaccines through the Department of Health and Human Service’s “Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)”, a program set up for children and they want us to believe this. Some people need to be put in prison for making such perjurious claims. The Indian Bar Association has serve Legal Notice on the WHO’s Chief Scientist regarding Ivermectin.

  7. Regardless of whether you think it was a good idea to forego animal trials for these drugs, presumably everyone would agree that at least the same degree of post-mortem inquiry should be accorded to the deceased as would have been given to the white mice who dodged this experiment. So, where are the autopsies, including, especially, biodistribution data on the genetic messenger and the resulting spike protein?

  8. I do not accept this claim made. If I were in charge of this I would have ensured autopsies be done right from the start, with full disclosure of relevant information (with holding identities), as part of informed consent for other citizens considering the same procedure and justice for the deceased, and their loved ones. It is the only ethical path.
    I know first hand (here in Australia) how sudden unexpected deaths are portrayed in the media by the authorities, compared to what actually occurs in detail known only to a handful of the closest loved ones. A mother of an acquaintance started to decline 20 minutes after injection. The decline continued for 140 minutes. Irreversibly so. Then stopped (deceased).
    I wonder what was going through this elderly lady’s mind during those 140 minutes.
    I speak my mind wherever I can on her behalf. She was innocent. She did not deserve this. She trusted the staff at the nursing home. She trusted everyone.
    Her family were divided about the decision to have the procedure. The explanation for her sudden death given publicly was that she had an existing lung condition. In fact she had dementia and asthma. And was doing just fine until the injection came along. The family knows the dementia and asthma did not kill her. The family knows the vaccine ingredients killed this lady who was doing quite ok as she was.
    It is apparent to me that the eugenicists “use” good people to do their “dirty work” for them. The eugenicists never go “face to face” with those being “duped”. No, they USE others to get what they want.

  9. When you read the actual reports, note the symptoms presented consistent with vaccine symptoms, and then the timing of the deaths….. many on the same, next or third day ….to conclude that these deaths are just “coincidences” i.e. not “causal” is completely absurd.

    1. Exactly. Due to the fact that no one believed the 12,313 deaths were just a ‘coincidence’, they halved that number under the guise of a ‘mistake’ and are hoping that we’ll now believe that 6,207 deaths are indeed just a ‘coincidence’.