Are the Scientific Journals Censoring the Science? Part 1: The Removal of the Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in VAERS, by Elsevier and Current Problems in Cardiology

Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite.

By Sonia Elijah

This is Part 1 of my investigative series looking into how certain experts in science and medicine, who have not gone along with the ‘official Covid narrative,’ have experienced their reports being abruptly removed from publication or have been rejected from the start.

Dr Peter McCullough, MD, MPH, one of the most cited physicians in the world, an eminent practitioner of internal medicine, a cardiologist and epidemiologist, co-wrote a report with Dr Jessica Rose, Ph.D., virologist and epidemiologist in Canada, called ‘A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products.’

The report relied solely on the data supplied by the US VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System), which was created by the US Food and Drug Administration and Center of Disease Control in 1990, to receive reports about adverse events (AEs) that may be associated with vaccines.

McCullough, along with Rose, examined the cardiac adverse events, mainly look...

Note:  If you need assistance with your subscription or would like to discuss a corporate subscription for more than 10 employees please contact us or use the chat (bottom right).

$5 / Month
Individuals at home that are reading our content for personal health care or other non-professional reasons.
Like a Starbucks a month
Personal - Single Payment
$50 for 1 Year
Individuals - reading for personal reasons who prefer to pay for one year in advance with no recurring billing.
18% discount to monthly
$12 / Month
Professionals from the healthcare industry who are subscribing on behalf of their company for work reasons.
Way better than coffee