RETRACTIONS ARE THE TIP OF THE CENSORSHIP ICEBERG

947

13 comments

- at -

May. 7, 2023, 11:00 p.m.

Opinion Article

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of TrialSite Inc., its staff, or its affiliates. The information provided is based on the author's understanding and knowledge at the time of writing and is subject to change as new information becomes available. Readers are encouraged to seek diverse perspectives and perform their own research before forming their own opinion.

Retraction of a published paper from a journal is its removal from the journal. It is typically done after findings of malfeasance, such as fabrication of data, substantial plagiarism, etc. However, in the era of COVID-19, retractions have taken on a new (or perhaps previously hidden) politically-driven dimension. Papers of high technical quality have been retracted if they question the government-industry approach to the treatment of COVID-19, and especially adverse effects resulting from the COVID-19 “vaccines”.

The Website Retraction Watch has been tracking retracted COVID-19 papers, and has identified 325 as of this writing (early May 2023). COVID-19 paper retractions have been addressed in substack articles, journal articles, and many other forums. The retraction of our paper on vaccinating children against COVID-19 was described in detail in an online newsletter.

Quality journalism costs money to produce.

Free access provides up to 10 articles

Subscription options start at $5 per month
which is less than a Starbucks coffee!

Peter Gabriel, MD

"Publishing on TrialSite helped me secure a $20m research grant for my work."

Jona Savinda

"TrialSiteNews is my daily read for what is happening in the industry."